Cooperation

Judging is always easier than understanding, though

What is cooperation? Can we call people as not cooperating when they refuse or simply does not want to blend with a bunch of gossiping crowd, talking nasty about someone else? Should all member of a workplace destined to be together, outside what their job description defines what’s theirs to do at work?

Does being unable to “go with the crowd” in terms of hanging out, joining noisy chatters, can be liberately identified as the inability to work together, to collaborate, hence the bad score of this person’s cooperative skill? Has the scorer evaluated this person’s work, has he valued professionally?

Instead of marking one-sided score why wouldn’t he mix the chit-chat skill and the true job results? And he clearly stated that what he did was only heard, not seen himself. A leader is not supposed to be clumsy.

The quality of what someone’s worth, in my opinion, should not be based on what people think about him when he barely exists on small talk group that does not initially have nothing to do with work; but to see what his points are, how he finish the tasks, how he collaborates with his co-workers.

People who judge from only one side is supposed to be wiser, to realize that a lot of things do very much need more than what meets the eye.