Data-driven attribution: the hype, the hope, and reasonable expectations

Last week eMarketer released new data highlighting the slow adoption of multichannel attribution among US marketers (subscribers only). Despite increasingly complex customer decision journeys less than half of those surveyed use attribution models that value assisting touchpoints. To quote Cindy Liu of eMarketer:

Advanced attribution modeling is used to track and score the effect of multiple marketing events leading up to an event… It is also more expensive and time-consuming to manage. Worse, the lack of industry consensus on what makes a good measurement model further hinders marketer adoption. For those reasons, multichannel attribution modeling is not widely used. eMarketer estimates that only 30.1% of US companies that are engaged with more than one digital marketing channel currently use multichannel attribution models.

Given slow adoption, it’s no surprise that many smart marketers and analysts recommend data-driven attribution as a simple solution to this complex problem. Suneel Grover of SAS. Ken Chaplin of TransUnion. Mike Osborn of HomeAway. The list goes on. Here’s how Google’s Adometry views data-driven attribution.

The logic behind data-driven attribution is compelling: combine big data with statistical models to isolate incremental impact using individual customer paths. Simple! Ignoring the 14% of marketers who find last click attribution “very effective” — likely advertisers blessed with simple purchase paths and simple media mixes — there are immediate opportunities to increase performance using models that more accurately attribute incremental value. But is data-driven attribution the right answer for your organization in 2016?

The bull case: how data driven attribution can transform your marketing organization

Data-driven attribution delivers three key benefits to marketers:

  1. Reduction of waste improves efficiency and drives bottom-line profit;

Customer journeys are shrouded in the fog of war but multichannel attribution — with executive support and good project management — can help pierce that fog. Successful data-driven attribution requires long-term capital investments but, compared to building inhouse models, requires relatively smaller investments in people. This is a material concern in today’s shallow market for analytics talent; hiring data scientists is increasingly difficult. For these reasons and more, data-driven attribution is a winning recipe for many marketers.

The bear case: how data-driven attribution can mislead your marketing organization

Like most things in life, data-driven attribution is easier said than done. At best, data-driven attribution is complex and expensive but directly increases businesses outcomes. At worst, data-driven attribution is a feedback loop for bad strategy that constrains marketers from taking calculated risks. As you evaluate the potential of data-driven attribution for your organization I encourage you to keep two principles in mind.

Garbage in leads to garbage out. When an attribution model does not show uplift your first reaction should be to examine strategy and tactics, not cut investment. Are we reaching consumers throughout their decision journey? Is our content and creative aligned with context? Mobile illustrates this problem well. The mobile gap to parity — 8% of ad spend on 24% of media consumption — is starting to close as marketers better understand cross-device journeys and put new measurement tools to good use. Attribution models might suggest devaluation of mobile but smart marketers read between the lines.

There is no single source of truth. It’s easy to lose sight that attribution is a means to an end, not an end in itself. To use another cliche: when you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Rigorous controlled experiments, deployed consistently, are an easy way to validate model output. No attribution model, data-driven or otherwise, will tell you the value of the strategy you don’t adopt. Experiments can help your team to develop institutional knowledge and take calculated risks on new strategies or ideas.

Is data-driven attribution better than last click? Almost always. Will data-driven attribution solve all your marketing challenges? Of course not! Reasonable expectations — about attribution generally and data-driven attribution specifically — are a smart starting point to cut through the hype. Here’s hoping 2016 is the year of attribution.

Analytics at Google. UVA Cavalier. Opinions are my own.

Analytics at Google. UVA Cavalier. Opinions are my own.