You don’t see how that kind of thinking is unproductive? Why be obstructionist to understanding? How are those questions not useful to making Talia’s narrative convincing to anyone with a hint of critical thinking skills? The issues being brought up by SFyimby are very much in line with a “prosecutor’s” line of questioning. Then again, that is how meaningful discourse is had. That is why that is how legal systems operate. Are you suggesting meaningful change should happen based on a singular perspective’s narrative? That seems very suspect.