Oh, you don’t see it.

You don’t see how that kind of thinking is unproductive? Why be obstructionist to understanding? How are those questions not useful to making Talia’s narrative convincing to anyone with a hint of critical thinking skills? The issues being brought up by SFyimby are very much in line with a “prosecutor’s” line of questioning. Then again, that is how meaningful discourse is had. That is why that is how legal systems operate. Are you suggesting meaningful change should happen based on a singular perspective’s narrative? That seems very suspect.

A single golf clap? Or a long standing ovation?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.