Daniel, I appreciate your ability to seek out information to further your argument, but you need to…
Omari Akil
72926

The problem goes way deeper than discrimination and the solution cannot be achieved by policies that give women even more short term benefits without any sacrifice.

The real issue is possibly the erosion of the black family. Violent crimes are commited mostly by people from disfunctional families (something shown to be true in every country and to every color) and the black family has been the main victim of social policies, in this sense, since around the second world war.

They were in better situation in the 30s than they were in the 70s or are today in many ways, even though they have more rights and receive benefits from the state.

Rights and quotas won’t save the world.

Government programs that help people on the short run and help politicians get elected are not always helpful on the long run, even to the very people who voted on them (even less helpful to their children).

Many scholars have studied this silent “war on the black family” and how it happened, but they don’t become famous and are not liked by everyone (specialy people who wanna feel like they are helping save the world just by being politically correct on social media).

The first study I know on this is “The Negro Family: The Case For National Action” from Senator Moyniham in 1965. It shows how the black family was in better situation than the white family before governments started to mess with it changing laws and creating programs based on pretty ideas without considering their actual consequences. Many more have been published but they are really easy to ignore using liberal clichés and political correctness in general.

It is clear that criminality is strongly related to broken families, but it is not so clear how so many got broken or why black families were hit harder. All studies I know on this have significant republican bias, but were very convincing. I can’t reproduce everything here so it will be easy to deny what I say.

In short: the Welfare State increased social pathologies in black communities (indirectly).

How?

1. by giving incentives to single mothers to have children out of marriage

2. by giving them welfare money that is higher than what their potential husbands could earn in the jobs avaiable to them, making men “useless” in their communities. Men, then, were not needed anymore. They went rogue. They have nothing to lose, no families depend on them.

3. By changing everything in the school system, making it more feminine and more and more unbearable to boys. Creating a scenario where they drop out and nobody cares, because they are men and women are priority. That takes away hope of getting money in legit ways from many boys. This also makes them even less attractive to their own females or potential wives.

Men are civilized by women. Without a woman at home, we become more barbaric, more “natural”. Without people who depend on us, we become more fearless with nothing to lose. We risk more, because men don’t care for themselves as much as they care for their “mission”.

Without incentives and hopes of legit money and jobs, we go rogue. Men turn to drugs, drink, smoke, promiscuity and violence, way easier than we would if we had wives and children to care for. And then male children are born into this and they get sucked into it as well by the same problems summed up to a lack of fathers (who went rogue). The problem becomes worse. People pretend easy solutions like more taxes and more subsidies, more quotas, will solve it. It will not, it cannot.

Unless we give incentives to MEN, unless we give them reason to become husbands and fathers, these problems will not be solved and they can get worse.

The problem is: women are the majority in our democracy. They are also the clients and consumers of everything. Women move the wheels of destiny, they hold the future of men in their hands.

Men care for women more than women care for men (unless its their kids). “Helping men” doesnt get anyone elected, women boycott things way more effectively than men. Men don’t protest their rights, we are too proud. The list goes on and on. I don’t see women letting this change. Men will not be helped in detriment of women and women would have to make sacrifices on the short term to gain long term benefits. Women don’t usually like short term sacrifice for long term benefit. In fact our whole way of life is becoming less and less prone to care about the long term.

The Black Muslims organization is probably the only organization actively promoting a solution to this problem.