Markus Gabriel’s Argument Against the World
Alexander Douglas
301

markus gabriel is on this list: Gabriel Vacariu (September 2017) The UNBELIEVABLE similarities between the ideas of some people (2011–2016) and my ideas (2002–2008) in physics (quantum mechanics, cosmology), cognitive neuroscience, philosophy of mind, and philosophy

https://www.academia.edu/s/1062176943/september-2017-gabriel-vacariu-the-unbelievable-similarities-between-ideas-of-people-and-my-ideas-2002-2008docx

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319877674_September_2017_The_UNBELIEVABLE_similarities_between_the_ideas_of_some_people_2011-2016_and_my_ideas_2002-2008_in_physics_quantum_mechanics_cosmology_cognitive_neuroscience_philosophy_of_mind_and_phil

https://philpapers.org/rec/VACGVA

CONTENT

Some preliminary comments

Introduction of my approach epistemologically different worlds”: paragraphs of my works 2002–2008

I. PHYSICS, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY

Chapter 1 Did Sean Carroll’s ideas (2016) (California Institute of Technology, USA) (within the wrong framework, the “universe”) plagiarize my ideas (2002–2010) (within the EDWs framework) on quantum mechanics, the relationship between Einstein relativity and quantum mechanics, life, the mind-brain problem, etc.?

Chapter 2 The unbelievable similarities between Frank Wilczek’s ideas (2016) (Nobel Prize in Physics) and my ideas (2002–2008, etc.) (Philosophy of Mind and Quantum Mechanics)

Chapter 3 The unbelievable similarities between Hugo F. Alrøe and Egon Noe’s (Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Denmark) ideas (2017, USA) and my ideas (2002–2008) (Bohr’s complementarity extended to ontology)

Chapter 4 Similarities between Adam Frank’s ideas (2016 or 2017?, University of Rochester in New York , USA) (“Minding matter — The closer you look, the more the materialist position in physics appears to rest on shaky metaphysical ground”) and my ideas (2005, 2008)

Chapter 5 (June 2017) (June 2017) Strong similarity between Carlo Rovelli’s ideas (Italy) in two books (2015) to my ideas (2002–2008)

Chapter 6 The unbelievable similarities between Simon Friederich’s ideas (July 2017, University of Groningen, University College Groningen, Faculty of Philosophy the Netherlands) and my ideas (2002–208–2016)

II. PHYSICS

Chapter 7 The unbelievable similarities between Radu Ionicioiu (Physics, University of Bucharest, Romania) and Daniel R. Terno’s ideas (2011) (Physics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia) and my ideas (Quantum Mechanics)

Chapter 8 The strong similarity between Pikovski Igor, Zych Magdalena, Costa Fabio, and Brukner Časlav’s ideas (June 2015) and my ideas regarding the Schrodinger’s cat’s interactions with its environment (the gravitation of Earth) (both entities being macro-objects) (Quantum Mechanics)

Chapter 9 The strong similarity between Elisabetta Caffau’s ideas (2015, Center for Astronomy at the University of Heidelberg and the Paris Observatory) and my ideas (2011, 2014) regarding the appearance of Big Bang in many places (Cosmology)

Chapter 10 Did Wolfram Schommers (2015, University of Texas at Arlington, USA & Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany) plagiarize my ideas? (Physics)

Chapter 11 The strong similarities between Dylan H. Mahler, Lee Rozema, Kent Fisher, Lydia Vermeyden, Kevin J. Resch, Howard M. Wiseman, and Aephraim Steinberg’s ideas (2016, USA) and my ideas (Quantum Mechanics)

Chapter 12 The unbelievable similarities between Bill Poirier’s ‘Many Interacting Worlds’ (2016) and my EDWs (Quantum Mechanics)

Chapter 13 Unbelievable similarities between R. E. Kastner’s ideas (2016) (Univ. of Maryland, USA) and my ideas (2002–2008)

III. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY OF MIND

Chapter 14 Did David Ludwig (2015, Philosophy, University of Amsterdam) plagiarize many of my ideas? (Philosophy (of Mind)

Chapter 15 Did Georg Northoff (2011–214, Psychoanalysis, Institute of Mental Health 9

Chapter 16 The unbelievable similarities between Kalina Diego Cosmelli, Legrand Dorothée and Thompson Evan’s ideas (2011, USA) and my ideas (Cognitive Neuroscience)

Chapter 17 Did Theise and Menas (2016, Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA) and Kafatos C. Menas (Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York; Schmid College of Science & Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA) plagiarize my ideas of Physics and Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy (the mind-brain problem, quantum mechanics, etc.) from 2002–2008?

Chapter 18 Did David Bourget (forthcoming 2018) (Director, Centre for Digital Philosophy, Western University (or University of Western Ontario) plagiarize my ideas?

IV. PHILOSOPHY (of Science)

Chapter 19 Did Markus Gabriel plagiarize (2013, Philosophy, Bonn University, Germany) my ideas (2002–2008)? (Philosophy)

Chapter 20 The unbelievable similarities between Andrew Newman’s ideas (University of Nebraska, at Omaha, USA) (2013) and my ideas (Ontology)

Chapter 21 The unbelievable similarities between Alexey Alyushin (2010, Moscow, Russia) and my ideas (Ontology)

Chapter 22 Did Jani Hakkarainen (June 2017, University of Tampere, Finland) plagiarize my ideas (2002–2008)?

Chapter 23 The unbelievable similarities between Dean Rickles’s ideas (2017, HPS, Univ. of Sydney) and my ideas (2002–2008)

Chapter 24 Did Sebastian de Haro (2017, forthcoming 2018[1], HPS, Cambridge, UK) plagiarize my ideas (2002–2008)

V. OTHERS

Chapter 25 The unbelievable similarities between other people’s ideas (after 2013) (for instance, Tahko E. Tuomas (University of Helsinki, Finland 2016), Côté B. Gilbert (Sudbury, Ontario, Canada 2013), Dan Siegel (Mindsight Institute, USA, 2016) and my ideas (2002–2008)

Conclusion [Obviously, there are other “specialists” that published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas but I have not discovered them yet…]

Bibliography

[Some people haven’t read my works but they claim my ideas can be found in other works. Soon, they will discover EDWs in Shakespeare, Bach, Sophocles and ET’s letter sent 10 million years ago… me vs. people who have plagiarized my ideas: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ciFTP_KRy4 ]

I wonder: what academic environment is that which promote PLAGIARISM, which does not care about plagiarism? After years of my ideas being plagiarized, nobody takes attitude. On the contrary, more and more people have been plagiarizing my ideas in the last 2–3 years and they are like “poisoning mushrooms after the rain”… Why academic environment (USA, etc.) promote thieves??? Those who promote thieves become thieves…

During 2500 years, nobody discovered the existence of „epistemologically different worlds” (EDWs). After I discovered the EDWs and published my main article 2005 (Synthese USA, one of the best journal in USA of philosophy of science), FIVE books (all English, posted FREE at my webpage and other pages) and mostly after I published my book at Springer in 2016 (a summary of my first five books), many “specialists” from different fields have published UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas. These “specialists” have been like “(poisonous) mushrooms after the rain”!! Why nobody published any idea about EDWs and all people have been working within the unicorn world (Universe/world) until I posted my books on Internet? Why none of these “specialists” published these UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas to my ideas BEFORE I published my ideas (2002, 2003, 2005, 2008–2016)? This is the “world of people” in which we live. Certainly, the history has never forgotten thieves! Those who promote thieves are also thieves.

[1] Forthcoming in Huggett, N. and Wuthrich, C. (2018), Space and Time After Quantum Gravity.

Like what you read? Give Gabriel Vacariu a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.