3D Bioprinting in Biomedical Applications

gamze🌱
5 min readJul 31, 2023

--

Introduction to 3D Bioprinting Process

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has evolved as a fairly simple approach for producing the prototype using bioinks in a precise form of the organ such that the cell grows in that printed component and subsequently develops as a fully functioning organ. It has acquired widespread adoption because it is suitable for producing prototypes for visual inspection purposes and because of its advantages such as great flexibility, customization depending on patients, scalability, reliability, durability, and extremely high speed.

Three-dimensional bioprinting is widely used due to these characteristics in the biomedical area and allows for more design and complexity. Bioprinting is often used to print tissues and organs suitable for transplantation by integrating scaffolds, living cells, and numerous other biological bioactivated agents.

Process of 3D Bioprinting

Application of Biomaterials in 3D Bioprinting Process

Biomaterials have been used in regulated pharmaceutical delivery techniques, sutures and adhesives, cardiac bypass, rehabilitative and orthopedic devices, ocular devices including corneas and corrective lenses, and dentistry.

Several components, including titanium, have been used to generate therapeutic implants. Bioceramics, polymers, metals, and composites are just a handful of the materials accessible.

3D Bioprinting Techniques

The most extensively used forms of 3D bioprinting processes are extrusion-based bioprinting, laser-assisted bioprinting, and laser-based stereolithography. The effectiveness of each printing technique is heavily reliant on biomaterial choices and functions.

Types of 3D Bioprinting

Biomaterials as Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting

Bioinks are fluid compositions that comprise three or four matrix constituents and are supplied into a bioprinter before being accumulated on the scaffold. Such scaffolds allow cells to connect, survive, bioaccumulate, and replicate after printing.

This cell proliferation phenomenon is important in tissue regeneration because it assists in the rehabilitation of dead body tissues. These multicomponent bioinks are used to produce various tissue constructions. The reason for employing multicomponent bioinks is because natural polymers such as gelatin and collagen are extensively utilized bioinks that aid in cell adhesion and migration. However, they have limited mechanical capabilities; to overcome these limitations, various additives and biomaterials are combined to make a multicomponent biomaterial with enhanced qualities. Rheological characteristics of multicomponent bioinks are critical; they must be accurately managed in order to provide optimum printability and structural stability of the structure.

Three-dimensional Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering Applications

The absence of appropriate vasculature into implantable frameworks is a significant restriction in bioengineered tissue constructs. Furthermore, highly vascularized tissue constructions are required for the proper functioning and survival of tissues and cells as a 3D tissues framework packed from metabolic active cells that are accountable for the establishment of necrotic cores in the absence of the vascular structure because it is limited to transporting nutrients toward and away from the tissues.

When a 3D tissue framework containing cells is implanted, the successful transmit of mass necessitates an intact microvascular network for sustaining the metabolically active activities of the cells inside the framework. The ingrowth of the microvascular network into the implanted bioengineered tissue framework, on the other hand, happens in a timely way, which is the most important accomplishment for therapeutic reasons. As a result, some researchers have acquired an interest and sought to manufacture and build the vascularized tissue framework using 3D bioprinting methods, which is a potential approach for this sort of application.

3D Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering Applications

Conclusion and Future Outlook

As a consequence, we can now generate body tissue, organs, 3D models, scaffold, and other components leveraging 3D bioprinting technology. Such bioprinting techniques are classified into a variety of technologies that may be used based on the application. These methods have been used in tissue engineering to develop implants such as porous scaffolds, cellular structures, biosynthetic tissues, and organs. This approach may be able to restore massive tissues and organs. It has been shown that fabrication of scaffolds has been efficiently made utilizing bioprinting based on extrusion, and ink- and laser-based 3D printing have trailed owing to software and hardware restrictions.

Multicomponent bioinks for cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation have aided several vascular systems. Gelatin-based polymers have also allowed cells to interact, develop, replicate, and diversify. Despite the 3D bioprinting technique being powerful, it has some limits that must be addressed, and other research methodologies must be developed to enhance it. Four-dimensional printing, like 3D printing, adds a fourth dimension of time in this context. In response to environmental factors, including pressure, heat, air, moisture, and radiation, these 4D-printed items may alter shape or function over time. Rapid breakthroughs in 4D innovation may enable us to build highly innovative components with a wide variety of uses in the near future. Miniaturization and sterilization of bioprinters and associated equipment, as well as making these systems user-friendly for end-user doctors, will be secondary design objectives in the future.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uHbn7wLN_3k

REFERENCES

1. ASM International. (2003). Overview of Biomaterials and Their Use in Medical Devices. ASM International, 1–11.

2. Babbar, A., Jain, V., & Gupta, D. (2019c). Neurosurgical Bone Grinding. In Biomanufacturing (pp. 137–155). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13951-3_7

3. Babbar, A., Jain, V., & Gupta, D. (2019d). Thermo-mechanical aspects and temperature measurement techniques of bone grinding. Materials Today: Proceedings, 33, 1458–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.497

4. Babbar, A., Jain, V., & Gupta, D. (2020c). Preliminary investigations of rotary ultrasonic neurosurgical bone grinding using Grey-Taguchi optimization methodology. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 10(4), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1108/gs-11-2019–0054

5. Babbar, A., Jain, V., Gupta, D., & Agrawal, D. (2021d). Finite element simulation and integration of CEM43 °C and Arrhenius models for ultrasonic-assisted skull bone grinding: A thermal dose model. Medical Engineering and Physics, 90, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.01.008

6. Babbar, A., Jain, V., Gupta, D., & Agrawal, D. (2021e). Histological evaluation of thermal damage to osteocytes: A comparative study of conventional and ultrasonic-assisted bone grinding. Medical Engineering and Physics, 90, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2021.01.009

7. Babbar, A., Jain, V., Gupta, D., Agrawal, D., Prakash, C., Singh, S., Wu, L. Y., Zheng, H. Y., Królczyk, G., & Bogdan-Chudy, M. (2021a). Experimental analysis of wear and multi-shape burr loading during neurosurgical bone grinding. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 12, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.060

--

--