garyweglarz
Aug 25, 2017 · 2 min read

Trusting Mr. “I believe the Warren Commission report,” and the 9/11 official story nonsense on any JFK related history is an iffy proposition I would contend. While I respect Chomsky for his past work on media analysis and his critiques of U.S. foreign policy, I also find his decades long and very consistend gatekeeping on the JFK assassination and now on the 9/11 false flag revealing and quite disturbing. There is a great deal of information available at this point to put JFK’s assassination in a context that totally obliterate Chomsky’s “no conspiracy” contentions. Chomsky seems to avoid examining any of this information in favor of repeating his old stale lines regarding who killed JFK: “Who knows? Who cares? Why does it matter?… The evidence against [a high-level conspiracy to kill JFK] is overwhelming” — while of course citing no such evidence, because it simply doesn’t exist.

Of course to anyone who has listened to Chomsky explain over and over that “organizing” is only way to bring about change, the notion that he can also simultaenously state that organizing to elect a president (in a representative democracy), who is then assassinated, is somehow a matter of no importance, well, this proposition is so illogical that it is rather beyond absurd. It should render anyone who is capable of thinking for themselves (and can put their hero worship on the shelf) to take a rather long look at Chomky’s other comments on the JFK assassiantion and 9/11, as they are very instructive regarding his role in gatekeeping for the underlying power structure.

The book by James Douglas, “JFK and the Unspeakable” is a good place to start if you’re not familiar with the reasons JFK was killed. Or, you could follow Chomsky down the rabbit hole of: “who knows? Who cares? Why does it matter?”

https://www.amazon.com/JFK-Unspeakable-Why-Died-Matters/dp/1439193886

)