No Ice, Except There Is Ice

6 min readNov 8, 2019

This video was originally published 19/8/2019

I chased down the story where Peter Ferrara was apologizing to the Global Warming ‘alarmists’ because the Earth is cooling. So, I went to Forbes and I was greeted by this message, “After review, this post has been removed…” I think, for them, this is an inconvenient story, even if it was back in 2012 and should be hidden from sight.

For those who have not read this, he only discussed what he had noticed regarding natural climate cycles that had started to twist Earth’s weather from warming to cooling. So, why would that story be removed? He was the director for the Entitlement and Budget Policy for the Heartland Institute, but his story was still removed because it failed to meet editorial standards. Take note, that was printed for a long time.

When I was digging into the stories about the hottest July ever, I stumbled across this information: NOAA does not have thermometer records for most of the world’s land surface, and this is still true up to now.

No Tricks Zone has also presented the NOAA temperature data set along with a commentary, informing us that one-fifth of the world’s land mass has estimated temperatures up to this point. They do not actually have land stations there, and they will not in the future.

On the oceans as well, most is estimated because those buoys are separated by substantial distances making the 100% temperature mapping prospect impossible.

If you dig into the statistics, 2,089 land base temperature stations are at work in Version3 unadjusted data currently. A hundred years back, in 1919, there are only 997 stations that are complete sets, meaning, not estimated measurements, only a percentage of those stations actually have the “full data set” claiming that it is the warmest year ever.

On the other hand, only 174 stations were present in the 1880s, and these gauges claim that the temperature has risen this much since 1880. So, the question is, how did they derive those numbers without a complete data set? Does that mean that their claims are based purely on estimates?

The manipulation of data by making the past cooler in order to achieve a warmer and linear trend is rampant today, because that is the only way for NOAA to say that the world is warming. But, when you look closely at the data, this is very much in question.

These thermometer datasets will continue to influence the global corporate media to scream that it is the hottest year ever. They will still tell you that next year is going to be the hottest ever, even if global temperatures will drop.

Japanese expert, Dr. Mototaka Nakamura, also said that global temperature trends since the start of the Industrial Revolution presented by NASA GISS are “fraught with huge uncertainty”. He added that they cannot make any meaningful differences for periods up to 1980.

This means that the 1980s are truly the starting point of when we had reliable data, to start mapping out the globe, and be able to pinpoint that it is warming here, there or everywhere.

I highly encourage you to look at how many stations that are currently in operation in Africa, and the locations of where they derived the last two years of “record heat”, because there are no stations there. They have actually been caught red-handed; NOAA has been fudging temperature data because there are no temperature stations where record temperatures were measured.

Moreover, Nigel Farage is criticizing Prince Charles again for saying 10 years ago that polar ice caps would disappear in seven years, that was 3 years ago, yet we still have ice.

This was 24 hours after slamming ‘woke’ Prince Harry and Meghan, who are only going to have two children because they want to save the planet. More importantly, what happened to what Prince Charles said 10 years ago that the polar icecaps would disappear?

If you ask me, this map below shows a lot of ice in the Arctic during Summer. For those of you in the United States who are trying to convert to metrics, that yellow is around 10-foot thick, the green is 7-foot thick, and the purple is 1 or 2-foot thick, approximately. No ice?

Looking at this linear trend graph of 2019 is it the lowest ever? Did you also notice how the corporate media always forgoes talking about January, February and March? That is because if you look at the black line, that is 2019, it is far above the other years. This is why corporate news outlets did not want to talk about these periods of time, because 2019 ice will surpass 5 other years on this chart, and they cannot convince people to give their money for a global tax.

But be mindful of all the events around you, volcanic eruptions are really starting to tick off globally spewing more ash and aerosol in the air and Harvard is talking about geoengineering, dimming the Sun, etc.

We are really getting into some sort of a Twilight Zone episode due to this Grand Solar Minimum. In my opinion you will really learn how to grow some of your own food.

Thanks for reading, I hope you got something out of the article. If you would like more content like this, I produce the tri-weekly Mini Ice Age Conversations podcast, 30 minutes of in-depth analysis on the GSM you can take on the go, throughout your day.

***Mini Ice Age Conversations Podcast***

iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/adapt2030

Soundcloud https://soundcloud.com/adapt-2030

Libsyn http://adapt2030.libsyn.com/

(MIAC #244) After Global Food Production Drops Then What?

http://adapt2030.libsyn.com/podcast/miac-244-after-global-food-production-drops-then-what

For the bi-weekly Grand Solar Minimum climate update newsletter from myself, David DuByne, (ADAPT 2030) jump over to oilseedcrops.org you can enter your email and sign up. Move your mouse around for about 10 seconds and this box will pop up.

Join ADAPT 2030 NEWSLETTER http://www.oilseedcrops.org