Poker, Free Speech and Wikileaks

Excellent essay, but your premise is flawed. Your Twitter quote is contextual. Daniel was not attacking Mike over his politics (easily criticised as they may be). I followed the original exchange. Mike owes Daniel money and Mike’s behaved badly over it. Nothing to do with politics other than Daniel responding to yet another of Mike’s dumb comments.

Like what you read? Give P Hanson a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.