Brief History Of Anti Hate Commissioners Council

Goose and Gander
Aug 26, 2017 · 5 min read

The history of Anti-Hate Commissioners Councils could be traced back to 2019 and the events that followed the extraordinary President’s elections in the United States.

The newly elected President Sandy D’Aloula was found dead due to what had been declared an unexpected heart attack. The joint investigation by FBI, NSA, and leading social media experts concluded that the heart attack happened due to extremely elevated levels of hate in the society.

Concerned and disturbed by the results of that investigation, the Congress passed a new Anti Hate legislation consisting of (a) creation of Hate Offenders Registry (HOR) and (b) Hate Enablers Prosecution Act (HEPA). HEPA introduced severe penalties to individuals and corporations who were found assisting or providing services to the registered Hate Offenders.

Initially, the Supreme Court declared HOR Act being in violation of the First Amendment. The Congress agreed with the ruling and modified the Act with the specification that the registry will be operated by NGOs that meet certain criteria. Those NGOs became the foundation of what later became Anti Hate Commissioners Council.

The established consensus was that Hate Offenders were targeting marginalized minorities, so it was quite natural that only representatives of these minorities and their allies were qualified to decide what constitutes as Hate Offense. Subsequently, those representatives formed the Council.

A few groups tried to mount a court challenge in order to have their representatives in the Council, but the Supreme Court ruled that those groups were not sufficiently marginalized and that the Council, as a non-Government self-regulating entity had full discretion and expertise to decide which groups were qualified to be recognized as oppressed, marginalized, and victims of Hate, and, as such, qualified to have their representatives in the Council.

During the Third AHCC Convention, the members unanimously decided that all possible qualified minorities have already joined the Council and that there was no need to accommodate other groups. Obviously, all those not-associated groups represented Oppressors and Haters.

December 2020 marked the introduction of Founding Anti Hate Principles. The First Founding Principle stated that absence of continuous and enthusiastic adherence to Anti Hate Principles and Policies was the major trait of Hate Offenders.

In May 2021 the first member of the Senate was added to the Registry due to the hateful inquiry regarding the reasons why one of the constituents was added to the Registry. That was a clear violation of the Fourth Founding Anti Hate Principle that stated the Oppressed Minorities should be listened to and not argued.

The Supreme Court ruled, despite the opposition from dissenting Justices, that while the Senator indeed had certain immunity, that applied only to immunity from the government actions, it does not apply to actions of NGOs in general and AHCC in particular

Immediately after the ruling, the dissenting Justices were added to the register. No court challenge was initiated in that case.

Meanwhile, the Congress and the Senate approved amendments to Fair Banking and Fair Employment Acts.

The Fair Banking Act amendment prohibited the financial institutions from providing any services to the individuals and corporate entities from the Registry. The accounts of the Hate Offenders were to be immediately frozen, with 30% of the assets immediately confiscated into Victims and Survivors Of Hate Fund. The rest of the assets were to be transferred to Anti Hate Trust and Management, an arms-length entity established for the ethical management of those assets until the Hate Offender rehabilitates.

The Fair Employment Act Amendment protected the employers and their employees from exposure to Hate by prohibiting any employment of Registered Hate Offenders. Also, the Act designated certain industries as Hate Friendly, as those were exposing the blatant absence of diversity, creating breeding grounds for Hate. These designated industries were banned from hiring non-diverse personnel until the target diversity levels are reached. The initial threshold was that 55% employees must be members of Oppressed Minorities, as designated by AHCC.

Internet and Telecom providers were subjects of Fair and Safe Communications Act of 2023, which prohibited facilitation of Spreading Hate. Three Service Providers that mounted a court challenge were added to the Registry and their data centers were pre-emptively transferred to the Trust and the other customers of those Providers received a Provisional Hate Advisory. The Supreme Court agreed with AHCC arguments that the action was justified and necessary to prevent further Spread of Hate.

A major step in fighting Hate was a clarification by the Supreme Court regarding the Second Amendment. Indeed, they stated, the citizens can keep and bear arms, but it does not mean that all citizens have rights to buy ammunition and other accessories for those arms. Naturally, all the Registered Hate Offenders were banned from purchasing any ammunition, weapons or any items that could be used as weapons. Similarly, they were required to install trackers/immobilizers in their vehicles to prevent those from being used as a weapon.

That decision also coincided with the official forming of United Anti Hate Brigades (UAHB) — the peace-keeping youth league of AHCC. Those brave people were the leading force identifying and fighting the hidden Oppressors and Hate Distributors. The Supreme Court established that Pre-emptive Self Defense (i.e. when Defense Activities are initiated prior to anticipated Aggression) practiced by the Brigades was legal and useful for the society.

The Unity Act of 2025 made non-participation in Anti Hate actions a criminal offense, punishable by a fine and conditional sentence for the first time and mandatory minimum 5 year term for repeat offenders, to be spent in the Anti Hate Rehabilitation Institutions in North Dakota and Alaska.

September of 2025 was a turning point for AHCC when a puny group of AHCC members tried to overthrow the democratic process in the Council, claiming that their minority was discriminated by the majority of the fellow Commissioners. The events that followed were recorded in the history as The Big Anti Hate Cleansing, which successfully removed those disguised Haters from the most democratic institution of our time.

December of 2025 marked the introduction of New Constitution. The purpose of the new Constitution was to enshrine and enforce the importance of protection of the Hated Oppressed Minority (singular, as under AHCC leadership all those dispersed minorities united into one). The legislative and executive powers were granted to AHCC.

While great progress has been made in Hate Fighting, the statistics presented by UAHB shows a continuous increase of Hate Crimes, year over year. The Supreme Commissioner in their recent speech to Nation promised introduction of further measures to eradicate Hate. We are all anxiously anticipating the details of the legislation that will shine as the brightest beacon, fighting the darkness of Hate that tries to cover our beloved country.

)
Goose and Gander

Written by

What is good for the Goose is good for the Gander