These are not two mutually exclusive conditions.
Tim Carpenter

We get to relive high school debate, how fun!

So because the courts ruled on a privacy case I cannot question the author’s logic when she submits an economic argument? Even though you admitted they were linked?

You are more than welcome to frame (another high school debate term) this discussion any way you would like it to remove my logical progression (high school debate again) that do not fit the frame as simply a straw man agreement…but hundreds of millions still disagree with the courts’ “compromise” so I believe expanding the discussion (or at least acknowledging this stuff is complicated) is still appropriate when dealing with this topic.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.