G Seaton
G Seaton
Sep 9, 2018 · 1 min read

The first infraction, so identified by the chair umpire, was the most absurd. The third one arguably should not have been issued either given the circumstances. It was a shame and left the ultimate winner, a woman also, who was winning without the intervention of the incompetent official, with a less than magnificent first grand slam victory over her idol.

I’m tired of officials being part of the story in events like this. Maybe he is misogynistic, i suspect he’s mostly incompetent and in that role, was given too much authority.

Thanks for the post.

    G Seaton

    Written by

    G Seaton

    a reluctantly old guy, not a reluctant old guy