This is a reposting of my Twitter thread summarizing articles written about the CEDEC BotW dev talks. You can find the original thread here: https://twitter.com/gypsyOtoko/status/915037635663425536

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/003.jpg

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/004.jpg

Got around to reading some of the BotW CEDEC articles (original article here: https://t.co/494TwAuYxi). Interesting fact — They managed all of their tasks by integrating their management tools with the game, so you wouldn’t get people doing the same work twice.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/048.jpg

A task could be created by setting up a sign in the world, and then all related specs and meeting details related to it could be readily available by clicking on that sign.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/049.jpg

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/050.jpg

There’s also a “field task view” that was set up for higher level items.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/051.jpg

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/052.jpg

It was apparently a great way for multiple devs to bounce ideas off of each other in regards to the task.

From a field design standpoint they discuss the “Triangle Rule”. They explain that using triangles carries out 2 objectives- gives players a choice as to whether to go straight over the triangle, or around, and it obscures the player’s view, so designers can utilize them to surprise players, make them wonder what they’ll find on the other side.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/020.jpg

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/021.jpg

There’s also variations that can be more visually interesting, to perk the player’s interest. Korok seeds are usually found in these instances.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/023.jpg

They have 3 different scales that they utilize this principle with as shown here — all to achieve different objectives.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/024.jpg

The slide notes that each different size plays a different role: the largest are landmarks that serve as visual markers, the medium sized triangles serve to obstruct the player’s view — whatever is behind them and the smallest triangles serve the tempo — be it to change whatever buttons the player is pressing or for more concrete play.

They also used rectangles as shown here. Instead of gradually revealing something, rects are good for completely hiding something from sight.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/025.jpg

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/026.jpg

You can get an idea for just how widely this concept was applied in this image.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/028.jpg

They give an example of how the design was applied in action in these images. Note how the structure in the distance is slowly revealed.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/031.jpg

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/032.jpg

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/033.jpg

Finally, the structure hides the tower in the back, so there’s this chain of interest — hill -> bridge structure -> tower.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/034.jpg

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/035.jpg

The beginning of the presentation discusses what specific changes they made in order to make the game more enjoyable. The first map images show 2 heat maps — showing what paths players originally traversed in playthroughs, and then the second map showing how much more well distributed that became after they made this specific change.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/005.jpg

Their initial assumption was that they could spread the towers throughout the map, and place game events in between, but they found that approach didn’t feel appealing to players.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/007.jpg

Players felt they were being guided, that the game was too linear, and people were having completely different experiences, in a bad way.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/009.jpg

They realized they could solve these problems with the concept they called “gravity”- placing structures of varying visibility/importance in different places, leading players in different directions and allowing to get sidetracked.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/014.jpg

This became a catalyst for “infinite play” — going back and forth between different structures.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/015.jpg

You can see in this image how the different structures rank in visibility — naturally drawing player’s attention, and in “objective”.

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/016.jpg

Image: http://www.4gamer.net/games/341/G034168/20170901120/TN/017.jpg

The objective order changes depending on how the player likes to play-if they’re aggressive, they’ll go after enemy camps to get better gear.

FYI — I found all these summaries here: https://t.co/8BF0pmwp4E. The Japanese internet notes that devs were in awe, stating things like “only NCL knows how to really make games”

From IGN Japan on debugging: https://t.co/iHiMeYWv9r. One guy foresaw that the game would be too complex to leave debugging till the end, so he had the foresight to champion for new practices — proactively fix bugs blocking programmers and bugs specifically requested for fixing. Also to implement a tool for easy bug reports, merging the tools for managing bugs with tasks, and implementing a system in the game for bug finding called #ZELDA_ERROR.