I’ve actually responded to that in the piece.
Tim O'Reilly
11

then how do you think about this one ?

‘… what bothers me is the faint hints of utopianism inherent in Zuckerberg’s declaration: engineers can make things better by sheer force of will — and that Facebook is an example of just that. In fact, Facebook is the premier example of just how efficient tech companies can be, and just how problematic that efficiency is when it is employed in the pursuit of “engagement” with no regard to the objective truth specifically, or the impact on society broadly.’

WHY TWITTER MUST BE SAVED by Ben Thompson
https://stratechery.com/2016/why-twitter-must-be-saved/

IMO, as long as Zuckerberg wants to keep Facebook neutral (political unbiased), he should go back to a timeline-bass feed (of only the friends of each users). Otherwise, he should keep on explaining how things work inside Facebook in a way that even ordinal grandmas and children can understand.

Show your support

Clapping shows how much you appreciated 坂和敏’s story.