Stopped to read on your “NEVER USE DOUBLE”
If you explained why, if you wrote it in normal letters not in caps, i might continue to read, but saying never use something because you heard it somewhere, without explanation and reasons why, is just plain.. not redabale.
Would you mind adding an explicit copyright statement and license on the gist with the security group management code, please? The gist says it is “Complementary” but that won’t satisfy people who are sticklers for tracking the provenance of code they use.
I’d suggest an MIT license or the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
I could not agree more! As the lead for security initiative at my company, I am constantly facing this notion that by doing some project or adding some layer of “security” we become more secure. This can be true, but more often it leaves our executives thinking: hey, we just spent lots of money and time on security, so now we’re more secure…