Really? Your Caitlin quote addresses only the DNC hack (cough LEAK!
Michael Harmon
21

I don’t understand what you’re saying at all.

The documents I cited are in reference to the inaccurate statement made by Caitlin that there’s no evidence of Russian interference. The documents are federally released declassified versions of the classified reports created by the FBI, NSA, DHS and the CIA. They contain hard evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Lots of evidence.

Which, I was addressing the comment that there’s no evidence. That statement is not true. I have no idea what you’re implying but each and every document I sited there can be pulled from the Web by anyone who cares to click any of the following links —

https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf

https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3726371/Read-the-transcript-of-the-conversation-among.pdf

https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY%20STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/joint-dhs-odni-fbi-statement-on-russian-malicious-cyber-activity

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.