Minecraft’s Visual Design and its Role in the Game’s Success

Introduction

William Schmidt
9 min readDec 5, 2023

Minecraft is an open-world sandbox game developed by Mojang and first released in 2011. The game was initially started as a side project by game developer Markus Persson in 2009, but after realizing the attention it was garnering, he founded the company Mojang Studios to oversee its further development and to provide an avenue for publishing.

A typical landscape scene in Survival Minecraft (In-game screenshot)

Minecraft’s visual style is unique in today’s gaming industry. While many video games strive for immersive and impressive visuals that take advantage of the latest developments in hardware and graphics, Minecraft seems to have gone the opposite route with a visual style more familiar to the early days of gaming. The game's world consists entirely of cubes or “blocks” which represent different materials like dirt, stone, and wood. Each block material is uniquely textured for added detail and distinguishability, albeit with coarse pixel art comprised of solid colors and simple patterns. Players, animals, items, and other entities in the game also adhere to the blocky aesthetic and pixelated texturing. Even with its departure from the typical triple-A game's visual language, Minecraft managed to become the best-selling video game in history, surpassing 300 million copies sold as of 2023. This essay explores how the distinct visual style of Minecraft has contributed to its success through its broad demographic appeal, encouragement of creativity, and hardware portability.

Demographics

The success of Minecraft is linked to its visual content appealing to a broad range of demographics, including children. The simplicity, gender neutrality, and generally child-friendly nature of Minecraft’s visuals significantly broaden its potential audience in comparison to many other mainstream games.

When a beginner player starts a new world in Minecraft, they are greeted by a natural landscape with familiar features. Trees, grass, water, and various other natural materials are depicted in blocks with simple and easily recognizable textures. The coarse blockiness of the world combined with a low texture resolution of 16x16 pixels per block as well as minimal animations help to produce a generally calm and low-stimulus environment for the player. Such an environment invites those who are prone to sensory overload to play Minecraft, as was found by Ringland et al.’s research into using the game as an assistive technology for youth on the autism spectrum (Ringland et al., 2016). Thus, Minecraft’s visual simplicity is a potentially appealing factor for those who seek a gaming experience with relaxing qualities.

Another inviting aspect of Minecraft’s visuals is its lack of gendered content. Problematic representations of gender have long plagued gaming, introducing a gender gap in the demographics. Many games portray female characters in a degrading manner, which ultimately skews the game’s demographics to become male-dominated as females are turned away by such depictions (Hartmann & Klimmt, 2006). The absence of gender characterizations or themes within Minecraft positions it far from this problem, and therefore Minecraft receives almost equal enjoyment from male and female gamers (Mavoa et al., 2018). The gender-neutrality of Minecraft’s visual content has helped grab a portion of the population that is often alienated in the gaming industry, further contributing to its success.

A large portion of the gaming industry’s demographic are gamers under the age of 18 (Entertainment Software Association, 2023). The inherently child-friendly nature of Minecraft’s visuals plays a pivotal role in capturing this demographic. Minecraft has an official age rating in North America of Everyone 10+, meaning the game is suitable for everyone over the age of 10, for the player’s potential to “engage in violent acts such as lighting animals on fire and harming animals with weapons” (ESRB, n.d.). Indeed, some parents of younger children have expressed objections to depictions of violence within Minecraft (Mavoa et al., 2017). However, the game has modes and settings that parents can activate to eliminate their child's exposure to such scenarios (Mavoa et al., 2017). The ability to tailor the Minecraft experience to the age of the player has given it an overall positive perception from parents, as they “feel a sense of ease at the prospect of their children engaging within the game’s relatively healthy play space” (Balmford & Davies, 2020). Thus Minecraft has been able to capture the market of young gamers, with a level of parental approval not seen in other games, due to the child-friendly nature of its visual content.

Minecraft’s options menu, from where the game’s difficulty level can be adjusted. Difficulty adjustment is useful for those who want to tailor the experience for their children. (In-game screenshot)

Creativity

Minecraft, as an open-world sandbox game, inherently acts as a medium for creative expression. Players can shape their virtual worlds with endless possibilities. The game’s openness and flexibility enable the construction of elaborate architecture, complex mechanical machines, or intricate redstone contraptions. The very nature of Minecraft invites players to explore the bounds of their creativity, making it a unique platform for personal and collective expression.

However, just like any creative medium, Minecraft has its limitations. The visual design of Minecraft places significant constraints on the level of detail a player can achieve in their constructions. The game world’s voxel grid limits the player to place a single block per every cubic meter, which in turn limits the resolution of structural details in builds (Minecraft Wiki, n.d.). Additionally, the number of different blocks available to the player is limited, and the textures of these blocks themselves are relatively low resolution. Another significant limitation is the lack of provisions for representing true curves, since, as previously stated, everything in the game is aligned to a grid.

A Minecraft build that utilizes many building techniques and repurposed blocks, including stairs on the roof to enhance the sloped effect (Image from Folli on YouTube)

Despite these constraints, players have developed a variety of building techniques, transforming these limitations into opportunities for creative innovation. For example, the lack of curved visual elements is addressed by using close approximations that rely on scale to trick human perception. A method to address the limit on structural resolution is to take advantage of the mechanics of the game’s entity objects and the fact that they are allowed to occupy the same grid cell as blocks. Furthermore, players have figured out how to repurpose blocks in unconventional manners to recreate real-life architectural elements that don’t have a representative counterpart in the game. A simple example of this is using stair blocks to add resolution to sloped details on the roofs of buildings.

Illustration of a technique frequently utilized by players to add more detail to their builds. Left: Torch block. Center: Item Frame entity. Right: Torch block and Item Frame entity occupying the same grid cell. (In-game screenshot)

Players’ success in circumventing the limitations of Minecraft’s visual design is a foremost example of creative limitation in action. Creative limitation is a concept from psychology that asserts the creative benefit of problem-solving under constraints. While common intuition might say that restrictiveness inhibits creativity, research has shown that “creative individuals and teams can benefit from various constraints, including time, financial, and processual constraints” (Rosso, 2014). Players of Minecraft are faced with the constraint of translating intricate designs into a rigid world of pixelated blocks. To overcome this constraint, they are forced to dig deeper into the game and discover mechanics that they wouldn’t have otherwise known about, such as the aforementioned mechanic of occupying a block with multiple entities. The challenge of overcoming such constraints within a game is conducive to player engagement, as players have a desire for difficulty and enjoy the gratification of overcoming a challenge (Przybylski et al., 2010). Ultimately, the visual design limitations of Minecraft present a challenge to the player, which not only motivates their ingenuity and resourcefulness but also increases their engagement and enhances their experience.

Hardware Portability

In the early days of gaming, pixel art and low-resolution graphics were commonplace. The limited processing power of early gaming hardware necessitated this low-fidelity visual style for a smooth gaming experience (Arsenault, 2013). As the gaming industry evolved and technological advancements were made, there became a trend towards more realistic graphics, with games aiming to deliver visually captivating experiences (Arsenault, 2013). However, this evolution has introduced a potential drawback. Games that prioritize cutting-edge graphics risk alienating a significant demographic of potential gamers who may not have the means to acquire the latest and most powerful hardware needed to run them.

In contrast to the prevailing trend, Minecraft took a unique route with its visual design. With its unique blocky aesthetic and pixel-art textures, Minecraft embraces a visual style more reminiscent of that found in older games. This unique visual design has not only become a defining feature of the game but also allows Minecraft to cater to the demographic of gamers who are unable to access powerful hardware. By adopting low-fidelity graphics, Minecraft ensured that it could run smoothly on a wide range of hardware, even those with relatively lower specifications. Minecraft was initially developed as a computer game only, but throughout the years, it has been successfully ported to various consoles and handheld gaming devices, as well as mobile devices (Minecraft.net, 2023). While the process of porting resulted in the creation of a new edition of Minecraft with slightly different features and mechanics, the visual style has remained almost identical across all devices, which is a testament to its portability (iconicNurdle, 2023).

The platforms on which Minecraft can be played. (Screenshot of minecraft.net)

Stemming from the relatively low hardware requirements of its visual design, the portability of Minecraft has played a pivotal role in its widespread success. The game’s ability to adapt to various platforms has significantly expanded its reach, making it accessible to a diverse audience, including those who might not have access to the latest gaming hardware, and those in the mobile gaming market.

Conclusion

The distinctive visual style of Minecraft is a key factor in the game’s unparalleled success. By delving into the facets of broad demographic appeal, encouragement of creativity, and hardware portability, it becomes evident that Minecraft’s pixelated landscapes have transcended mere aesthetics and have become integral to its identity and popularity. The broad demographic appeal, encompassing players of all ages and backgrounds, attests to the universality of Minecraft’s visual design. Its encouragement of creativity, despite inherent limitations, transforms the blocky canvas into a realm where imagination knows no bounds. Moreover, the game’s hardware portability, enabled by its low-fidelity graphics, ensures that Minecraft can be enjoyed by a vast audience regardless of their access to high-end gaming devices. As Minecraft continues to evolve and captivate audiences worldwide, its distinct visual style serves as a reminder that, in the landscape of gaming, simplicity can be a recipe for enduring success and cultural significance.

References

Arsenault, D., Coté, P. M., Larochelle, A., & Lebel, S. (2013). Graphical technologies, innovation and aesthetics in the video game industry: A case study of the shift from 2D to 3D graphics in the 1990s. G| A| M| E Games as Art, Media, Entertainment, 1(2).

Balmford, W., & Davies, H. (2020). Mobile Minecraft: Negotiated space and perceptions of play in Australian families. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157918819614

Entertainment Software Association. (2023, September 25). Essential Facts — Entertainment Software Association. Entertainment Software Association. https://www.theesa.com/2023-essential-facts/

ESRB. (n.d.). ESRB - Minecraft. ESRB Ratings. https://www.esrb.org/ratings/35148/minecraft/

Hartmann, T., & Klimmt, C. (2006). Gender and Computer Games: Exploring Females’ Dislikes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 910–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00301.x

iconicNurdle. (2023, September 19). Differences between Minecraft Bedrock Edition and Minecraft Java Edition. Microsoft Learn. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/minecraft/creator/documents/differencesbetweenbedrockandjava?view=minecraft-bedrock-stable

Mavoa, J., Carter, M., & Gibbs, M. (2018). Children and Minecraft: A survey of children’s digital play. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3283–3303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817745320

Mavoa, J., Carter, M., & Gibbs, M. (2017). Beyond Addiction. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116638

Minecraft.net. (2023, October 20). What is Minecraft? Build, Discover Realms & More. Minecraft.net. https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/about-minecraft

Minecraft Wiki. (n.d.). Block — minecraft wiki. https://minecraft.fandom.com/wiki/Block

Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A Motivational Model of Video Game Engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019440

Ringland, K. E., Wolf, C. T., Boyd, L. E., Baldwin, M. S., & Hayes, G. R. (2016). Would You Be Mine. ASSETS ’16 : Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility : October 24–26, 2016, Reno, Nevada, USA /, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982172

Rosso, B. D. (2014). Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams. Organization Studies, 35(4), 551–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613517600

--

--