Take RBAC seriously and do it first!

In the early stages of virtually any startup, a crucial decision that falls to the C-suite involves selecting a cloud platform and establishing an account. Cloud platforms today offer comprehensive toolsets designed to mirror an organization’s structure accurately, facilitating budget management, compliance, security, and more. However, our experience has shown that stringent security measures, such as code audits for third-party JavaScript libraries, may not always correlate with startup success. One of our clients, who prioritized such security measures, unfortunately did not survive as a startup. This observation suggests that, unless explicitly required, security might not be the top priority for many. For instance, compliance with regulations like HIPAA is non-negotiable for some of our clients, yet we’ve observed instances where engineers reported multiple access violations. These ranged from restricted access to essential tools due to potential exposure of protected health information (PHI) to unauthorized access to sensitive databases being openly discussed without consequent action. Such examples underscore the critical need for Role-Based Access Control (RBAC).

RBAC is fundamental to securing an organization, acting as a cornerstone for any robust security framework. It presupposes a well-defined organizational structure with clear roles, permissions, and change management processes. However, the reality for most startups is quite different. The absence of such structured processes implies a significant gap in security measures. This gap can be attributed to various factors, including but not limited to:

1. Shared Passwords: Many startups, due to a lack of familiarity with identity management solutions provided by cloud platforms, resort to using shared accounts for cloud instances. This practice not only complicates the process of revoking access when employees leave but also poses a significant security risk if such credentials were to be misused. Implementing zero-trust security models can mitigate these risks and should not be overlooked by startups.
2. Inconsistent Organizational Structures: It’s common for startups to track their organizational structure across disparate systems, leading to inconsistencies. For example, while Git repositories might accurately reflect the structure of engineering teams due to the pull request review mechanism, non-technical employees might not be represented. Similarly, HR tools like Greenhouse or Workday may not be regularly updated. Achieving a single source of truth regarding organizational structure can be challenging for startups.
3. Varying Degrees of Access Control: Management styles regarding access control can fluctuate between being too permissive and overly restrictive. Initially, many startups adopt a restrictive approach due to fears of data breaches. However, as client demands and the need for external collaborations increase, they may become more permissive, sometimes overlooking the risks associated with sharing access credentials.

Addressing these challenges requires a balanced approach that incorporates both technological solutions and a culture of security awareness. Startups must prioritize the implementation of robust access control mechanisms like RBAC from their inception, alongside fostering an organizational culture that values security. By doing so, startups can lay a solid foundation for sustainable growth and resilience against security threats.

Contact infraheads for free consultation.