Isaac Black
Sep 3, 2018 · 3 min read

I’m so happy today. Why? Because I can finally comment on this author’s utopian and “consistently so off the mark comments”. This author, I think, is vying to be the next name on the list behind Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and we can throw in the insignificants like Castro and Hugo Chavez. Why do I say they are insignificant? Because unlike the others, formerly mentioned, only 10s of thousands died in the name of equality and fairness as opposed to the others who killed millions and 10s of millions.

This author paints blue skies and puffy clouds in the face of tornadoes and Typhoons. He promises that if we could just tax the rich enough equality would happen, and we could all happily sing together Kumbaya in blissful ignorance. Clearly this author has read no studies that tested the idea of no incentive to do better and how the results rapidly decayed. He fails to, or unwilling to, see that when you take away the incentive to do better that you stop doing better. He doesn’t understand that service, at restaurants in the US is better because we tip here so the server has an incentive to serve better. Does he not think that we like sports because of the competition and the thrill of winning. Would we still go, or watch, a sporting event if at the end of the season, rather than have playoffs we would just say everyone gets an award for trying hard? No champs, no losers.

This author, like all utopianist, think that a great country is formed by everyone being happy for the sake of happiness. He doesn’t realize that what makes a great world is great countries. What makes great countries are great, in the US, great states. What makes great states are are great cities and towns. What makes great cities and towns are great neighborhoods. What makes great neighborhoods are great families. What makes great families are great parents, who work hard, have children, sacrifice for them and teach them that their life is not their own, that they were blessed to be given life, that that blessing comes with a requirement to be the best possible person they can be and that growth goes on throughout their lives whether at the home or outside the home. It continues to repeating the cycle of going out into the world and tryng to make it better individually, not as a collective. A collective is nothing but a bunch of people who didn’t try their hardest so they pooled their assets to live in misery. In the collective there isn’t harmony. There are people who are always trying to move up and willing to cheat someone else to get there. In the collective people feel they have been short changed, they live in shortage, rather than abundance. They think they are entitled to what other more successful people have. They don’t look in and admit their own short falling, they see themselves as victims. When they fall it is failure as opposed to the successful person who, when falling, sees it as a learning opportunity to the next success.

So Yes, I’m happy today that I finally get the opportunity to contradict another disaster ridden utopianist and hope just maybe 1 or more people will see the truth that Utopianist is just the pied piper leading the sheeple off the cliff to misery.

    Isaac Black

    Written by