Itai Vardi
Jul 10, 2017 · 1 min read

I sincerely don’t see where your rebuttal is. For example, what does this paragraph even mean:

“Is it true that virtually everyone grossly understates the dangers posed by climate change? Yes. But is the gravest threat pure runaway climate change? No: it’s too little, too late, plus race and class war, plus experiments with the planet. It’s the danger, essentially, of a vicious rightwing minority imposing the privilege of the affluent few over everyone else. That’s the real and scary (and political) story.”

What’s “too little, too late”? Stopping the climate crisis..? If so, how does that square with your ctirique of “disaster porn”?

Perhaps you rushed to publish something and missed the target?

I’m legit asking these questions. I really don’t get your essay.

    Itai Vardi

    Written by