Unnamed sources? Journalists should teach readers why they were used
Dr. Denny Wilkins

I think the disclaimer should go even farther. It should explain that the motives of the person who advanced this un-sworn testimony and un-verifiable point of view are unknown and the accuracy and truth of any such explicitly anonymous report in the world of politics is automatically suspect.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.