Please Alexa?
Louise Armstrong
11

great blog, and I think you’re absolutely right about its potential effect on our communication. It instantly reminded me of an insight from JMGreer (from the Archdruid report blog — something of a classic) — 
“ Power exerted through a machine is defined purely by I-It relationships; the only way to relate to a machine is to compel and control it, and (not, please note, “or”) to be compelled and controlled by it.. That defines the direct relation of person to machine, but it also tends to define the indirect relation of person to person when a machine is the medium. The logic here is straightforward: a machine can only transmit those aspects of relationship that require no inner life to communicate, since a machine has none.”
[…]

“ It’s possible for a relationship between people that passes through a machine to avoid being flattened out into a relationship of compulsion and control, but it takes work, and tends to be most successful when the people in question also have interactions that aren’t dependent on machines. The more that human life and human interactions are defined by machines, the more difficult this tends to become”

food for thought…

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.