Let’s Drop the “Disorder” From Autism Spectrum Disorder
I do not like the diagnostic name for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) because it classifies autism as a disorder. The DSM-5 (the manual used for classifying and diagnosing mental health disorders) defines ASD by its “symptoms,” which are primarily negative external behaviors that differ from neurotypical behavior.
For example, the DSM-5 lists the “deficits” that ASD individuals experience. There can only be a deficit if there is a standard for behavior. That standard is based on neurotypical norms. Neurotypical norms are not the only valid way to be. Furthermore, there are many problematic and harmful neurotypical norms that are not beneficial for humankind (we’ll have to save that for another essay).
By listing the “deficits” and “symptoms” of ASD, the DSM-5 focuses on the perceived negative aspects of ASD. It implies “THIS is what is wrong with you.” It is harmful because it pathologizes autism.
For example, one of the symptoms listed is, “unusual interest in sensory aspects of the environment.” How is this a bad thing? I think it’s wonderful that autistic individuals are interested in the sensory environment around them.
The pathologization of autism is an inaccurate portrait of autism. It focuses solely on perceived negative external behaviors and misses the key internal…
