Jack Allows Bullying, Bots And Harassment Mobs.
Jack can say that they apply their “rules” objectively but no one on earth can really tell what their rules are.
For instance Jack Dorsey says that,
Randi Lee Harper is a Republican.

Randi Lee Harper has a Non Disclosure Agreement with Twitter, boasts of having her own “mob of harassers,” and can silence LGBT with a third party script she wrote.
(HT = hashtag.)
Randi has the power to silence LGBT and disconnect them from their support networks.
Networks that are critical to LGBT health and welfare and she does it knowingly and does not care who she harms.
With LGBT suicides upwards of 40% Randi knowingly separated LGBT on twitter from their support groups. For some LGBT in awful communities that vital support group IS the only support group they have.
“For LGBTQ people who want access to the internet and want connection, I think it’s going to have a devastating impact,” she said.
Net neutrality, Daniels explained, is “saying that internet providers cannot distinguish between types of sites — they have to be neutral about the access we have to the internet, and they can’t make a distinction that costs different amounts of money for different content.”

The above tweet by @herracks will NOT embed on Medium and display. We believe Twitter algorithm is blocking embedding of tweets they do not want visible to the general public. The tweet exists, and is LIVE now on twitter.
LGBT activists have to beg a Republican, Randi Lee Harper, to be able to use Twitter.

Randi declares some Twitter customers her “enemy.”
And she found a way to fight her enemy (Jack’s customers) and make money at the same time. By writing a bot or bots.
And if she silences LGBT in the process she does not care.
Maybe Jack would like to explain to Congress and the whole world why his consultant can do exactly what he complains about? To make money? By abusing twitter customers.
And why can Sarah Nyberg, @srhbutts, write a bot to target people for dogpiles?
So what is a “dogpile?” Spamming them until they give up and leave twitter or set their account to private.
Naked Security By Sophos explains,
You won’t see the replies, but the followers of the blocked account will. Which means if you’ve blocked someone who was encouraging abusive behavior from their followers, they can still egg on dogpiles from their main account by retweeting you.
And if you are friends with Randi Lee Harper who has ann NDA with Twitter and tweets with Jack Dorsey you can do that.
You can be as abusive as you want if you are Randi Lee Harper because she is privileged.
And no matter how abusive you get, how much you tweet to your audience screenshots of your unwitting victims you can do it indefintely if you’re in the “In Crowd” on twitter.
And you can do it to make money.
Jack clearly favors some of his custmers over others. Whether he rationalizes it through “policy” or waves a magic wand and allows abuse it’s the same effect on the people abused by Randi Lee Harper and Sarah Nyberg.
The feel cyberbullied.

By Someone Jack Tweets with. Hmmm.
Randi is a serial abuser.
Oh by the way. Randi Lee Harper also tweets instructions on his ISIS creates their bot nets. Some safety expert.

The bias may NOT be so much in ENFORCEMENT of policy, by lack thereof of an army created by a person who declared their intent to fight a war on twitter. To make money.
Randi doesn’t care about who she discriminates against.
Why does this woman have a Non Disclosure Agreement with Twitter and how is it she has not been suspended for years of traumatic to her victims, abuse?

