Don’t agree w/ the premise, which is to say, that Don Lemon had idea’s or opinions so outlandish that some (including the author of this article) disagreed with so he was hated, but now cause he got drunk on air and had some interviews go the way (he the author wanted them to go) he is a bit more enjoyable. SMH.

Is Lemon and his ideas only an “asset” when he stays w/ the progressive left agenda or is it only when he is drinking on air? I would think Lemon’s voice is amplified and most considerate when he takes stances that seem to be his own rather than just following a particular ideology as it seems this writer implicitly suggests he should.