Jameson SpivackinCenter on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown LawPulling Back the Curtain on the Technologies Automating Inequities in the Criminal Legal SystemMay 30, 2023May 30, 2023
Jameson SpivackinCenter on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown LawWhat’s past is prologue, present, and futurePredictive police technologies create the future they foresee by extending the present.Jun 2, 2022Jun 2, 2022
Jameson SpivackinCenter on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown LawInnovation illusionHow “innovation” obscures the human costs driving technological change.Jan 12, 2021Jan 12, 2021
Jameson SpivackinCenter on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown LawNew Paper: Legislative Approaches to Face Recognition in the United StatesA new paper from Center staff about legislative approaches to face recognition was published in AI Now Institute’s biometrics compendium.Sep 2, 2020Sep 2, 2020
Jameson SpivackinCenter on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown LawThe conversation on face recognition technology is just getting startedIn 2019, face recognition technology became an integral part of the public privacy debate. In 2020, these conversations will come to a head.Dec 17, 2019Dec 17, 2019
Jameson SpivackinCenter on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown LawTrusting “somewhat” is not enough: why we need to regulate face recognitionThe public is more skeptical of police face recognition than recent studies would you have believe. Either way, regulations are necessary.Sep 9, 2019Sep 9, 2019
Jameson SpivackinCenter on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown LawThe best disinfectantPublic access to government records is vital to a functioning democracy and fuels much of our work on face recognition.Aug 7, 2019Aug 7, 2019
Jameson SpivackinCenter on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown LawIt’s not just the tech sector that isn’t representative — it’s the people making the laws, tooTo mitigate the harms of AI we need not only a diverse tech sector, but a diverse group of people regulating the tech sector.Jun 27, 2019Jun 27, 2019