1. It’s true that it included links but those links are mostly garbage. The “charts” don’t link to any data. It doesn’t look more credible with all this info added.
  2. Neuroticism is a parameter, neurotic is “high in this parameter”. The important part is not <something> is different but HOW MUCH DIFFERENT. Things are measured and quantified. 5% difference is not the same as 500%. The manifesto says

Neuroticism (higher anxiety, lower stress tolerance)

This may contribute to the higher levels of anxiety women report on Googlegeist and to the lower number of women in high stress jobs.

It’s a correct link to the definition but with a wrong implication. “Neuroticism” doesn’t mean a “noticeably higher neuroticism” (i.e. a neurotic person).

Personality studies find that women score moderately higher than men on neuroticism, by approximately half of a standard deviation

“Moderately higher” (half of a standard deviation means they significantly overlap with men). How much higher should the parameter be to show a substantial difference not only noticeable in reports, but leading to a substantial under-representation in certain occupations? 5 times? Scientist, my ass.

But, yeah, it’s all about THE evil media, even though the second one is a CEO email. Fake news, fake news. Let’s do some more Grammar Nazi for our Nazi leaders.

    Jane Doe, programmer

    Written by

    Silicon Valley, California

    Welcome to a place where words matter. On Medium, smart voices and original ideas take center stage - with no ads in sight. Watch
    Follow all the topics you care about, and we’ll deliver the best stories for you to your homepage and inbox. Explore
    Get unlimited access to the best stories on Medium — and support writers while you’re at it. Just $5/month. Upgrade