This is going to be the weak link I think: the cardinal points that guide enterprise and business activity do not overlap much, if at all, with any conceivable moral compass that would be useful in moderating AI development and deployment. The hammer =nail scenario…
And at employee level, people will do what it takes to keep their job- even if part of that job is encouraging people to adopt the very AI- driven services that will make their own role obsolete in short order.
Private citizens end up acting in this task-based and silo-ed way, as if somehow work- or business- related behaviour occurred on some different plane with this very different ethical culture, unrelated to ‘life’ per se and especially to life in a democracy.
People at all levels of interaction with AI have to be reminded that we all have skin in this game- like it or not, understand it or not.
Specific examples may help people to think through the AI question e.g is this a good thing or a bad thing?
The automation that follows AI is the problem. It leads to efficiency, yes… but also to loss of empathy opportunity, to problems of overfitting, to privacy issues and to literal dehumanisation…and hence that bit closer to Nuremberg Trials.
