Hi Carol,

I appreciate you reading my article, but I think you’re nitpicking. In the first debate, she clearly argued against the $15 minimum wage now. She said it was not a good idea. But fine, if you want to say it’s not really a false statement I’m fine with that. I said that those were unimportant.

Her speaking fees are another matter. You have to be incredibly gullible to think that she did not know that she was running for president. Taking those speaking fees was flat-out bribery. The only thing the public doesn’t know is that taking speaking fees as a sitting politician is ILLEGAL. Or it would be more of a scandal.

And your comment does nothing to argue against my basic points: Arnovitz piece is deeply logically flawed and we have very grave and valid reasons to think that Hillary Clinton is not at all honest or trustworthy.