Julian BagginiinThe Philosophical InquirerIs “good enough” ever good enough?Do we need to aim for perfection to do our very best?Feb 26, 2021Feb 26, 2021
Julian BagginiinThe Philosophical InquirerThe Sustainable Food ParadoxWhy are so many attempts to eat ethically counterproductive?Feb 23, 2021Feb 23, 2021
Julian BagginiinThe Philosophical InquirerThe Art of AbidingWhy the Dude is a hero not to be emulatedFeb 17, 2021Feb 17, 2021
Julian BagginiIn praise of the baristaContemporary baristas have more in common with traditional tea masters than you might thinkFeb 16, 2021Feb 16, 2021
Julian BagginiinThe Philosophical InquirerSex is not a needWhat was once a liberatory slogan has become an instrument of oppressionFeb 9, 20213Feb 9, 20213
Julian BagginiinThe Philosophical InquirerWe, the gullibleIf I can be scammed, so can youJan 27, 20211Jan 27, 20211
Julian BagginiinThe Philosophical InquirerIntellectual sinsThe longer the Hume racism debate goes on, the more I’m convinced his name should not be removed from The University of Edinburgh’s…Jan 22, 20212Jan 22, 20212
Julian BagginiinThe Philosophical InquirerTrump’s boast reveals the complexities of war ethicsTrump’s proud claim to be “the first president in decades who has started no new wars” is both false and simplisticJan 20, 2021Jan 20, 2021
Julian BagginiinThe Philosophical InquirerSex is not an actWhy you can’t separate what goes on between the sheets with what happens before and afterJan 18, 2021Jan 18, 2021
Julian BagginiinThe Philosophical InquirerThe Paradox of Inclusive LanguageWhen using inclusive words is a marker of wokeness, does it becomes a means of excluding the un-woke?Jan 15, 2021Jan 15, 2021