Question. Why call them “UAP”? Answer. Because in the long run it will broaden the societal discussion. Long-term implications are briefly discussed.
Joseph Burkes MD 2023
The original term from the late 1940s was “flying saucers.” This was replaced by “UFOs” according to researcher Stanton Friedman in part because the military wanted to downplay the popular interpretation that these “saucers” had ET origins. By calling them “unknowns” the myth was perpetuated that the US Executive Branch didn’t know what they were. The Roswell Incident and other crashed and gifted saucers documented by investigators prove that the authorities did know what they were.
So why should we use the term “UFO” that was, and still is, a tool to further the coverup?
Inasmuch as my contact experiences have led me to develop the Virtual Experience Model (VEM) describing how many sightings are not necessarily of “objects” but instead are possibly “holographic like projections”, why should we use a term that calls them “objects” (the “O” in UFO). I call this type of contact event a Virtual Experience of the First Kind type a (VE-1)a
In a VE-1 type b, flying saucer intelligences might be energetically stimulating the neuronal networks of targeted individuals. This could explain why some witnesses see “craft” and others standing next to them see nothing, or see something entirely different. In either of these two cases, holographic projections or neuronal stimulation, witnesses are not perceiving “objects.”
Granted, the rebranding of UFOs to UAPs is a ploy by those forces in the military intelligence industrial complex that are pushing for more openness on the subject. But this is a good thing because under conditions of more openness contact experiencers are now becoming more accepted as bona fide witnesses that should not be ridiculed.
In my opinion, it is somewhat infantile to cling to an outmoded term based on familiarity. The term “UAP” allows us to broaden the societal discussion, and perhaps someday will facilitate organizing a social movement around this issue. It is my hope that over the long run activists will link the anomalous phenomena to possible solutions to the seemingly unsurmountable problems facing our civilization. I am referring to global warming, war, racism and the obscene disparities of wealth and power that exist across our wounded planet.
If, as many believe, that advanced intelligences called “ET” or “inter dimensional”, are in our reality, then we can only hope to have an open and more equal relationship with them by undergoing profound spiritual, ethical and social transformations. In my judgment, this can only come about by creating broad based popular social movements that facilitate such transformations in human consciousness. Clearly such radical change will not happen overnight. It will be a gradual effort that will unfold over generations. Thus, the term “UAP” is superior to “UFO” because it a small but helpful step in a long-term process that will advance human civilization. I suggest that the term “UAP” should be adopted by the public, experiencers, and especially contact and disclosure activists.
For additional blogs about the societal impact of a possible ET presence click on the links below.
The blog linked directly below is a detailed analysis of the reasons for 75 years of denial of the reality of UFOs. Flying Saucers threaten our planet’s elites, but not the Earth’s people.
You can’t control a person who wants “no thing.” I suspect that Flying Saucer Intelligences are feared by our planet’s elites because they can’t be controlled by the usual methods applied to the general population. If we start to identify, not with things and thought forms, but rather with universal consciousness, then ultimately, we cannot be controlled either.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/10/19/why-do-the-control-groups-oppose-an-et-presence/
Confirmation rather than the big “D” Disclosure is likely the next step in the authority’s gradual acclimatization program. The possibilities of linking flying saucers to solutions for major terrestrial problems is discussed.
If flying saucer intelligences threaten all terrestrial elites, but not necessarily the Earth’s people, then it is understandable that governmental response to UFOs is a counterintelligence one.
The Leadership Crisis in ufology. In the UFO subculture there are few leaders, mostly celebrities.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2021/12/22/the-leadership-crisis-in-ufology/
What will it take to convince people that UFOs are important?
“Science, Counterintelligence & UFOs”
Researcher Val Germann wrote this important multi-part article in 1997. He has given me permission to repost his work on my blog site.
https://contactunderground.wordpress.com/2022/09/04/science-counterintelligence-and-ufos/