Admins, is there a point when we can stop re-hashing this same point of view?
Mark Phillip

Mark, please feel free to point out anything in this article that you feel is a “rehash.” Or did you even bother to read the whole thing? (No, scanning it doesn’t count.) Or do you think it qualifies as such because I wrote two articles in a row on the same subject?

In any event, I do not “have it out” for RideAustin, nor have I ever. Whether I’m a “fan” of it is entirely beside the point: aside from me taking issue with how its CEO reacted to my previous piece, I expressly tried to limit the content of this article to a discussion of the facts. Most of said facts are unambiguous, e.g. RideAustin has stopped reporting its ridership data and a Texas Monthly reporter wrote an article about the company using content appropriated from my previous article. I think a reasonable observer would conclude that quite a few of these facts reflect poorly on RideAustin. To state the obvious, I played no role whatsoever in most of them. Finally, all of the above is entirely about an Austin startup, so why wouldn’t it be appropriate material for

Yes, I am disappointed by some of its recent actions, in particular its failure to disclose important facts to its single biggest asset and its most fervent supporters: its drivers. Not telling them that they wouldn’t be earning any surge-level fares this past weekend is simply unacceptable, considering quite a few of their drivers rely on it as a primary means of financial support. I’m also chagrined by its censorship of dissenting views and deactivation of drivers who voice them in a public forum — which would be a disturbing trend for any company, but is especially the case for a nonprofit. (Speaking of: how am I “making Austin look petty”? Seems like you’re shooting the messenger here.) Again, this is basic fact, not my personal opinion.

Finally, I was flummoxed by what I could’ve said in my article to provoke such a response on your part, but I just took a look at your Medium “recommend” list and gained a fair degree of clarity. I think a better summation here might be, “Mark Phillip isn’t a fan of Uber or criticism of its competitors. Duly noted.”

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.