This story is unavailable.

How can you make the claim, “ ….at least for the workers a few have their jobs, so they should be happy”?

Wasn’t Trump supposed to fine companies that outsourced their labor? Was that not the original winning condition? This/Your mentality is very poor when you take everything into account.

Before: “We won’t give them (Carrier) an inch.”
After: Well, we’ll save at 38% (800/2100) of the jobs, we ‘ought to be thankful.”

This doesn’t even take into account the $7M that the taxpayers of Indiana are on the hook for. A terrible, terrible precedent.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.