I Am A Transwoman. I Am In The Closet. I Am Not Coming Out.
NOTE: Wow, I wrote this piece anonymously and privately and did not intend for anyone else to actually read it. It was a way for me to vent frustration without incurring risk. I didn’t tweet this out; I didn’t post or share this. Someone found it and spread it and that’s perfectly okay, but what you’re reading is essentially a diary entry.
If you are trans and closeted or suspect you might be, DO NOT treat my decisions as advice—they are based on my circumstances. Seek out and speak to other transwomen and absorb their experiences, too. Transitioning helps many, many people and living in hiding can be much more damaging. Let this be just one of many narratives you take in.
But I will talk through the door!
Resentments on the theme of “the only real transwoman is an out transwoman.”
Here are some pieces of the story. It’s not everything but it’s more privacy than I’ve ever wanted to sacrifice.
I am six years old.
I wake up from a dream that I am a girl, my heart racing, feeling sick to my stomach. I am not sick with disgust; I am sick with shame. It’s not the first time I’ve had this dream, although it is one of my earliest memories. What I feel (although I won’t have access to the metaphor until years later) is like I have, via a rogue HDMI adapter, accidentally projected my most intimate browsing history in front of a classroom. I feel that somehow I’ve been caught—as if everyone in the world watched my dream in their sleep last night. But I want to dream it again. I am six years old and I believe in God, so I pray to dream it again, which — of course — I do.
Correlation, meet causation. No funny business, you two.
I am seven years old.
In school we read a chapter book about a boy who changes into a girl. My heart throbs until I feel it in my teeth and I feel like everyone is staring at me. Of course, they aren’t. Back at home I stare at the cover, which shows a boy looking into a mirror to see a girl looking back, and I cry.
I hear from a terrible singing cricket that if you wish upon a star it will come true. Almost every night I sneak out of bed and stare out the window, wishing on every star I can see, just to cover my bases. Ever the magical thinker, I tell myself that if I wish out loud one thousand times, I will wake up with long hair in cute pajamas with a different name — and maybe freckles. One thousand, to me, is such a powerfully large number that the cosmic committees — which listen up at night for desperate, whispered wishes — couldn’t possibly miss me. I wish I were a girl, I say to myself over and over (demonstrating a frankly impressive grasp of the past subjunctive). Soon I am singing it to the tune of “The Farmer in the Dell.” I laugh at this, out loud, and it feels like there are two of me sitting awake in my bed — me in cuffed baseball pajamas, and me in the periwinkle blue nightgown I love so much on Wendy Darling.
I am aware that the singing cricket movie is not the Wendy Darling movie. Don’t be pedantic; I am seven years old.
I am eight years old.
My favorite people are (and will remain for my whole life) girls — my teachers, my mom’s friends, my classmates. They’re I don’t like to play with boys. Boys are generally dumb and they have boogers in their noses. A somber ring finger performs a gender examination in my nostril. When I play computer games in private, I choose a female character. When it feels safe, I enter a female name. “Kimberly” is one I like, because Kimberly is the pink power ranger.
When I ask to sleep over at my friends’ houses, I am told I am not allowed. Boys are not allowed. My friend Caitie’s mother argues about this on the phone with my mother. I realize my mother is not on my side.
Later, my mother tells me Caitie’s mother is divorced, has a tattoo, and sleeps on a waterbed, the relevance of which doesn’t seem clear. I think Caitie’s mother is cool.
I am nine years old.
I love everything my sister loves, but I will not admit it. I know she and her friends will make fun of me. I know my parents will chastise me and correct me. I am learning the rules, and I am learning that boys liking girl things is a very high stakes issue. I am learning that adults react the same way to my interest in makeup as they do to my interest in matches and lighters.
As if maybe, by being what I am, I might burn down something very important to them. Something that makes their life more comfortable and easy.
I am jealous of my sister’s clothing. One day, home alone after school, I sneak into her room and pull on her Tinkerbell Halloween costume. I slip the elastic straps over my shoulders, then the tights along my legs. It fits. My heart feels like the fist of someone trapped under a frozen lake, battering the surface from underneath. How could anything feel so wonderful and so miserable at the same time? I don’t feel like a weight has been lifted — I feel like I’ve put down one weight and picked up another. I run to my room and hide the costume under my mattress. Later, I return it to my sister’s bedroom.
This is not the last time I do this. There isn’t a last time I do this.
I am ten years old.
I watch television every day after school. I am drawn to science fiction and supernatural fiction shows. In these shows are villains who can inhabit other bodies or shapeshift. There are machines that swap people’s brains. Even in the more realistic shows there are zany Freaky Friday scenarios where Brother and Sister bonk heads and spend a day learning how hard the other’s life is. I have trouble understanding why Brother doesn’t drop to his knees and thank the god of head bonks.
Spoiler: their lives, it turns out, are equally hard for different reasons! Which is a comfort and relief for writers who nearly had to consider a non-egalitarian existence mediated by chaos, patriarchy, and contradiction instead of magic, consistency, and narrative resolution.
“THE GRASS IS ALWAYS GREENER,” shouts the screenwriter as he shoots up in bed and reaches for his idea book.
I am eleven years old.
I am in a hotel room watching Maury Povich. A lineup of beautiful women makes its way onto the stage and we are told to guess which ones are “real” and which ones are “transsexual.” I don’t know about these words. I don’t even fully understand what “gay” is, although I pretend to. I suspect “transsexual” is related to “gay” but this doesn’t bother me. Instead, as the hotel coffee machine gurgles out an acrid belch, I feel hope welling up inside of me. How much does it cost to sit in the chair and have them flip the switch? Will it hurt? I don’t care. Any amount of pain will be worth it.
I am twelve years old.
I am watching a VHS tape in health class, put on by an unwitting substitute teacher who pulled one from the pile. It’s a human interest documentary from the nineties, recorded from television. It is about people they call transsexuals, and it espouses the easy-to-digest, binarist born-in-the-wrong-body narrative that will remain popular for another decade. The people in the documentary are not the beautiful, smiling, Hawaiian women on Maury Povich. They are tired. Old. Midwestern. The documentary explains about vaginoplasty. The reporter uses phrases like “the surgeon attempts” and “dilator” and “salvage.” Like “hormones” and “osteoporosis.” I fear needles; I fear pills; I fear scalpels; I fear hospitals. The reporter talks about a “long road to recovery.” I realize there is no chair and no switch. I realize also that I don’t fully understand pain. The tired, midwestern wives née husbands have grown their hair and wear dresses. They seem happy.
For the rest of my life, two days is the longest I can go without thinking about this. I read stories about powerful, adventurous girls late into the night so I don’t have to think about what my body looks like under the blankets.
I am thirteen years old.
The internet has arrived and I have learned with some relief that there is, at least for now, a condition called Gender Identity Disorder. I do not know that in the next decade there will be waged culture wars over what is the best thing to call me — nor that they will happen on this very internet, which is just where I go to print out pictures of girls that my parents conveniently assume I have crushes on.
I create a fake(?) screen name on AOL Instant Messenger and tell my school friends that I am my own girlfriend, Jennifer, from a few towns over. I use this screen name more than my own. Jennifer does everything I do and everything I’m not allowed to do.
I develop an eating disorder.
I am fourteen years old.
I begin to show an interest in programming, which might be the most obvious sign so far.
When I help my dad build things, he calls me strong. I feel like I am winning something and losing something at the same time.
I am fifteen years old.
I move to the east coast, to a state that both is and isn’t the South, and attend an all-boys boarding school on a scholarship. I hate the idea of having to spend all of my time with other boys. Boys are immature. Boys are hypersexual. Boys are violent.
I shower in the dead of night, when the communal bathrooms are empty. More than once I am hazed for this. My penis is yanked at. A football player’s finger quests between my clenched buttocks while he asks if I’m gay, and if that’s why I’m afraid to shower with everyone. These are not my people.
I am sixteen years old.
Some of these are my people. I meet boys who like to read what I like to read. I meet boys who also have terrible secrets. I meet boys who agree with me that it is terrible to be a boy, although they don’t seem to mean it in the same way that I do. We are not proud to be boys, but we have fun with each other. We throw rocks into ponds and have sixteen-year-old arguments about time travel. We steal condoms from the convenience store. We are beaten up sometimes. We watch Fight Club and beat each other up wearing layers of socks on our hands as boxing gloves. Then we give each other belly rubs—even the football players. We sneak into each other’s rooms late at night to tell stories. We download Blue’s Clues episodes on LimeWire on a whim and end up hosting weekly viewings out of sincere appreciation. We lie about our sexual experiences, but we listen raptly to each other’s lies as if they might contain traces of truth, like veins of sexy quartz. Some of the boys are straight and some of them are gay — I kiss a few of each. I realize that I do not love boys in the same way that I love girls, but I do love them still. I wonder what this means — if the fact that I prefer girls is evidence of my boyhood.
One of the boys, from Korea, gets circumcised at sixteen because the girl who asks him to the Sadie-Hawkins dance makes fun of his uncut penis.
I am seventeen years old.
Girls start to think I am a cute boy. I start to think I am an ugly girl.
I am eighteen years old.
Laura Jane Grace comes out. In Rolling Stone, she recounts a childhood spent “[praying] to God: ‘Dear God, please, when I wake up, I want a female body.’ Other times [she’d] try the devil: ‘I promise to spend the rest of my life as a serial killer if you turn me into a woman.’”
I am in college. I learn that some people ask to be called by different pronouns. I see how this feels in my head. It doesn’t make much of a difference. I still want to sit in that chair and flip that switch. Pronouns are the least of my concerns.
I visit a women’s college. I am surrounded by new women and we feel instantly comfortable around each other. I attend a lecture. The speaker yells “who gets to be a woman?” and a crowd of cis women responds “anyone who wants to be!” The sentiment is nice, but I think about the years I spent staring out the window at the stars and I feel suddenly uncomfortable.
Later during this trip I am having a conversation with my new friends about femininity. They are articulate and intelligent women. I’m grateful to be around them. Until I am told by one of them, angrily, that I am not really allowed to talk about femininity because I am a straight cis boy. It is not my place and it is not my territory. I should shut up and listen. Are these my people?
I don’t correct her. I never correct anyone.
I am told there is something special — something ineffable — about Female Friendship. I am told that I could not understand or experience this. They said anyone is a woman who wants to be—is it true? What does this say about my friendships with girls?
I start to consider what I might be, if my girlness hasn’t counted simply because it wasn’t overtly confessed. I think about my boyness—about my childhood and adolescence—how my experiences with boys deviated from what I was taught to expect. I change my major and spend a year writing about non-gay-identifying male femininity from the Aesthetics of the late 1880’s to vaudeville radio stars. Eventually, as a love/hate letter to coming-of-age films of the 80’s, 90’s and early 00’s, I write my thesis on the friendship and sexuality of American males and its representation in television & film. One piece of feedback is “I am so sick of boys writing about boys.”
I think about being told I was not allowed to speak about femininity. I wonder what a person like me is allowed to speak about.
One of the boys from boarding school, who began to shower with me late at night, who told me through gritted teeth that he was too skinny and too fat, throws himself in front of a train.
I am nineteen years old.
I am in a gender studies class. I am still bewildered that the subject I have been fixated on, reading about, and studying obsessively since my life began is now a thing my friends want to take classes on.
I am told that masculinity exists in opposition to femininity and that it is unequivocally toxic. I think about the cruel male “mentors” I’ve been assigned throughout my life I think about the football player’s roving knuckle, and hundreds and hundreds of other things.
I think also about the kind, self-sacrificing male mentors who have found me. And I think about the boys I stayed up late telling stories with. And the boys I kissed. And boys who supported me. And boys I supported. And hundreds and hundreds of other things. And I think about me.
I raise my hand and timidly, carefully disagree. I know what it looks like.
My professor rolls her eyes. The rest of the class are ciswomen; they laugh. The good qualities I’m talking about are actually femininity, they explain.
I say that I feel like claiming that self-sacrifice and kindness are feminine values that men are borrowing is like claiming that they are Jewish values that Buddhists are borrowing.
One of the students tells me that I can’t be objective about masculinity because I am a straight cis male, and that I should shut up and listen. Are these my people?
I don’t correct them. I never correct anyone.
It is interesting to see where people insist proximity to a subject makes one informed, and where they insist it makes them biased. It is interesting that they think it’s their call to make.
I hand in a term paper on the medicalization and pathologization of trans identities, especially as it affects developing legislation and employee benefits. I like this issue because it’s difficult. It’s a practical problem that requires a delineation between “should be” and “is.” There are two sides and there are important factors on both of them. To be open-minded is to accept liminality.
Liminality becomes my favorite word.
I am twenty years old.
I see Hedwig & The Angry Inch for the first time. At the end of the film, Hedwig is nude and wigless and wet — an androgyne with a body neither male nor female. Hedwig’s male sidekick Yitzhak, played by the beautiful, square-jawed Miriam Shor in prosthetic facial hair, is given a wig and a dress. She does her best to look like a man starved of his femininity, finally granted relief. I can not pretend she is a man, but I cry every time I see it.
You Might Be A Cis If: This doesn’t fuck you up entirely.
This is also the year I begin to attend drag shows, both on campus and around the city. They’re not…exactly right, but they’re closer to right. I think about how much better I feel in makeup — and how much worse I feel in makeup.
I can’t, like so many kinds of women do, pretend to believe that Beyoncés anthems to beauty, flawlessness, and Waking Up Like This, are about me or for me.
Which is fine. I don’t need them to be.
Laura Jane Grace releases “Transgender Dysphoria Blues,” and it makes my chest swell like only a lone voice of solidarity can do. My cisfemale friends side-eye me whenever I play it and remind me that “it’s not just a banger — it’s a song with a message.”
I become an ardent fan of Eddie Izzard, who describes himself as a “male lesbian.” Though many accuse him of internalized transmisogyny — afraid to call himself trans — I at least admire his rejection of the constant attempts to squeeze his identity into a universal taxonomy that other people decided on. I admire his focus. I admire his courage when he wears dresses onstage. I respect his position when television forces him into a suit. I admire his willingness to be something confusing. I don’t think we are the same thing, but I think we have both come to the same conclusion.
Some nights, always alone, I go out in scavenged makeup and women’s clothes with an ID I found in a lost wallet. I never feel more male than on these nights.
It’s dark. I wear tights. I go sit in bars and drink alone. A lot of what happens is what you would expect. When you don’t pass, you are injured. When you do, you get exactly what you’d expect being a woman alone at a bar. I have no rose-colored notions of what public life as a woman—trans or cis—entails.
The dominance of the born-in-the-wrong-body narrative wanes. Genderfluidity gains popularity. Agender and nonbinary identities are explored and categorized on tumblr. I feel dull in the face of all of these beautiful, jean-jacketed, bowtied mavericks with dyed undercuts, because the boring binarist wrong-body narrative of the 1990’s is the one that fits me best, even after all this time. I have always known. It’s the first thing I remember knowing.
At twenty I have finally told someone — a long-time friend and fellow transgirl — about my lifelong struggle with what is now called gender dysphoria. I wonder what it will be called in five years. My friend’s story is different from mine — she didn’t even consider that she might be trans until her teenage years and never felt she was a born-in-the-wrong-body case — but it feels nice to know someone understands, at least partially, about all of this.
I am twenty-one years old.
Misandry humor is peaking and it is dripping with cissexism. Down cascade the gleeful tweets from ciswomen about how women are more beautiful than men — how graceful the female body is, how utilitarian the male. How awesome boobs are. How bad boys’ taste in clothing is. How incompetent they are emotionally. How they’re too weak to handle childbirth and periods. Neckbeards are the scourge of the internet. They wax disgusted about “dad bods.” SCUM rhetoric is revived with inconsistent levels of irony. The meme gospel says penises are just shitty clitorises.
Is this how trans works?
I don’t know where I stand in this. I don’t know my place in this. Are these my people?
Do I think a wig and a pronoun will change how they feel, deep down? About my body? About my chromosomes? About my “socialization”? I don’t. I want to, but I don’t.
They can believe deep down their feelings on who is smart & strong & reasonable and who is dumb & weak & dangerous are within their control, are controlled exaggerations and self-aware and performed, are well-examined. If they saw me nude and wigless and wet, would I not be subject to their funny opinions on penises? On neckbeards? On maleness? On who has a right to talk about femininity? They will read this and tell themselves “No!”
Yikes! Eyebrows! But I’m sure I‘ll be feminine enough.
On the internet where I used to Ask Jeeves “what is wrong with me,” I now get into a lot of arguments about gender. I have always been revolted by my body hair but could never shave it. Even if I could raze my leg-brows without raising eyebrows, it comes back in thick, right away. I mention to a cis feminist friend that I don’t think it’s cool to use “neckbeard” as a pejorative. I say I think it’s hypocritical. I say I know some wonderful, tender, thoughtful neckbearded humans. I also know some people who are very self-conscious about their neck hairs and can’t do much about them. I wonder if there are ways to criticize people based on their character without impugning the hairs that come out of them. She says I am mansplaining. She says I am Not-All-Men-ing. She also says I couldn’t possibly understand the standards of beauty imposed upon women. As if I didn’t spend years bent over a toilet, feeling miserably that even if I were thin enough I wouldn’t be girl enough.
Of course she couldn’t know my story, but my story is not what made true what I was saying.
I posit to her, after useless, stressful paragraphs of diagonal argument, that there are so many dimensions to the body hair conundrum When you are cis and you don’t shave your legs, some people think you are a gross feminist and some people think you are a badass feminist. You have the privilege of experimenting with your body hair because your status and your identity are otherwise secured in ways they are not for transwomen.
Of course she couldn’t know how often I cried after puberty when my leg hair started coming in—felt helpless because I couldn’t even shave it.
But my story is not what made true what I was saying.
They may call you names but they will not force you into the wrong bathroom. It will not collapse the trembling house of cards you’ve constructed to make people forget what they think you are. You are safe where some people are not.
When you are trans and you don’t shave your legs, it is taken as evidence to everyone — even to allies in their dark, unadjustable subconscious — that you are not a real woman. Sometimes even by yourself.
She is furious. She tells me I am a straight cis male and I need to shut up and listen. What she is really furious about is being contradicted by someone who, according to their facebook profile, has a lower ranking on the intersectional discourse chart than she.
A person’s privilege can be an explanation of why their beliefs are warped, if indeed their beliefs are warped. It’s not proof of shitty beliefs. Those tend to out themselves by…being shitty. If a person is telling this cis girl she is taking for granted a privilege that trans girls don’t have, why is it this cis girl’s instinct to hunt for that person’s identity to see if she can discredit them and not have to think about their point? Don’t answer that. We already know.
Another time I joke about an author who I think is not a great author. I am told that I don’t get to joke about that author, because they are an author with many female fans—their work is coded as a feminine interest. I am told that I just don’t respect them because their work is feminine, and that I probably worship Bukowski and Kerouac. They don’t know I grew up reading this author. I am told that I don’t understand what it’s like to grow up feeling ashamed of my interests because they are feminine.
I want to scream.
I want to vomit up the Lisa Frank stickers I peeled off my desk in second grade and ate, in a panic, to hide the evidence.
On Facebook, the girl who tells me about my childhood—about how I have never had to feel ashamed of my identity—has uploaded a photograph of herself as a little girl, dressed as Tinkerbell, standing beside her smiling parents.
Because of my eating disorder, my hair is falling out. I think about the horror of going bald—a permanent loss of vitality. I think about how it would destroy the feeble androgyny that is my only comfort in this body. I think about my grandmother, bald from cancer, and what that did to her. And I hear my proudly misandrist-identifying cisfemale friends making fun of bald men as if it were a shortcoming or decision of the men themselves. Bald men make them think of television pedophiles. Bald men remind them of self-indulgent authors and desperate improvisers. I see men on the train losing their hair, their youth, their options, and I feel for them. It’s not funny. It’s a dysmorphic nightmare for anyone. I don’t bother mentioning that I find the jokes unnecessary and insensitive. I know what the girls will say.
But I know I am not straight, or cis, or a boy. I am nothing so simple as that. I am a girl who has been through a lot of shit and who has grown into symbiosis with her boy suit. But what else I know is that my point is my fucking point. Do I even want to convince someone who will only listen to me when they find out I’m a girl?
Do I have to out myself to be treated like a person worth listening to? To stop my cis classmates laughing at someone who’s reckoned with the boundaries and the dimensions of masculinity and femininity in ways they never had to? Do I need their permission to speak?
I genuinely don’t know.
I am twenty-two years old.
A student in my performance art class hangs an empty mirror frame in the center of the room and has everyone pair off into subjects and reflections. A female classmate duplicates my actions perfectly with almost no delay. I look into the mirror and see her face and her freckles — I wave my hand and see painted nails. I get severely dizzy and have to leave the classroom. I cry big, shaking sobs in the men’s bathroom and come back twenty minutes later. The class is over.
I am twenty-three years old.
What I look like is this: a boy. A boy who has inherited more body hair than he can fight back, even in the places where he’s allowed to. A boy many ciswomen look at and say “you look like you like Mac DeMarco, ha ha.” (I do.) “I bet you read Jonathan Franzen.” (I don’t.) “I bet you like Breaking Bad.” (It’s okay.) “I bet you are a self-proclaimed male feminist ally but don’t read women authors.” (Fuck right the fuck off.)
These women have explained to me, with self-righteous anger, with smug superciliousness, what a transwoman is.
Part of me wants them to go through my books—wants them to see where the raised, blurred stipples are, which pages of which books are warped by tears going back over a decade.
Most of me wants them nowhere near my books or anything else of mine.
I am twenty-four years old and I don’t know what to do. Without reservation, I embrace the theory of intersectional feminism. I need it — we all do. But do I want to join those hip intersectional circles that won’t have me until I disclose my most private experiences? That will tell me to shut up until I lay bare every year of dissociation and dysmorphia and dysphoria?
Do I need to be inspected and dissected by the people who laughed at me to receive my credential?
I am now twenty-six years old and I am not coming out as trans, and I am not transitioning. Here are the easy reasons:
Because there are social and financial repercussions to transitioning that I cannot afford emotionally or financially. I don’t want to be treated like I have glass bones by well-intentioned cis friends. I don’t want to be told I am “so pretty” when I hate my reflection. It doesn’t make me feel better. It makes me feel worse, and it’s almost impossible to get cis people to turn it off. And I’m uncomfortable enough with the hateful judgment I get when I foray female-presenting into the city alone.
There are monumental pros and cons to being trans-and-out and in some cases, like mine, the scales are locked even. I choose to experience my dysphoria in private and without relief to absorb the discomfort of delicate cis people so I can glide through the world more smoothly on a frothy trail of secrets and lies. (I’m being bratty and disingenuous here. I’m just afraid this is how you conceptualize it.) Gay and trans people have been doing this for centuries. It happens that I don’t quite think the climate is right for me to be Out ‘n About. But I am excited and happy for the trans children of tomorrow. Jealous of them, even. Maybe there will be a chair and a switch someday.
Because it turns out transition isn’t the answer for everyone — to suggest otherwise is narrow-minded and proscriptive. Because for some transwomen, femininity can feel asymptotic — the closer you get, the more you feel you can never make it. I realize it’s not an inspirational message but it’s a hard truth: some people manage dysphoria better than others. When you fight it, it fights back. I am a pharmacophobe and diagnosed obsessive compulsive. I can barely take NyQuil and a cowlick can make my blood pressure rise. I am not strong enough for that battle. I am not well equipped to transition.
The best I can do, for me, is divest—as best I can—my identity from my appearance and focus, mindfully, on other things. It’s not impossible! Look at those Dust Bowl folks—they were just trying to drive across the country in a jalopy! “Gender?” they would say, “I hardly know ‘er!”
“Spironolactone? How about some f*cking bread?!”
I adore Laura Jane Grace, but I never wanted to be a punk rocker. I don’t want to be a conversation-starter or a curiosity, and that’s what I would be in this world, to so many people. All I wanted to be was Wendy Darling. I wanted to be an average girl with an average girlhood. I will never be able to go back and have my friends do my hair at sleepovers. I will never go back and wear a gown to prom. I will never have had a girlhood. I’ve had years to try and be at peace with that loss and sometimes I manage. We’re humans. None of it’s fair. So many of us have things taken away from us.
I have read the #eggmode pieces.This one in particular is very good and presents a valuable and kind-hearted perspective. I have seen transwomen use “egg” as a playful pejorative for a time in their lives when they were still developing their presentation and ideologies—sharing awkward pre-transition photos and shaming their past shelves for questionable aesthetic decisions. Even when it’s self-inflicted, it strikes me as uncompassionate, but how these people deal with their own histories is their business. When it’s aimed at other people, however, in an effort to diminish their position or their authority on their own identity, it reflects a prescriptiveness and smugness that I would never have expected coming from the trans community.
Imagine a cis-woman evenly saying:
“I wish I looked like that but I don’t and can’t. It sucks and it makes me feel really awful if I brood on it. That’s why I focus on my writing—I’d rather make things. Investing in and building things that aren’t my body helps me cope with the body issues I’ve been saddled with against my will.”
She doesn’t sound like she needs advice on how makeup will actually fix her core problem, does she? She seems like she’s doing alright. I’m her and I’m trans. That’s all.
I appreciate the encouragement I receive from trans friends, but I reject the implication that transitioning is my destiny. My brain is my brain — my body is my body. They don’t match, and I’ve chosen to devote my energy to coming to terms with that and focusing on other things, rather than trying to change my body. I am not advocating this position to other trans people or discouraging anyone from pursuing the path they feel is best for them. I admire and applaud each and every brave, pliable person who can do both.
Now—here are the complicated reasons, most of which I only realized while writing the easy ones:
I hate that the only effective response I can give to “boys are shit” is “well I’m not a boy.” I feel like I am selling out the boy in baseball pajamas that sat with me on the bed while I tried to figure out which one I was supposed to be, and the boys who I have met and loved from inside my boy suit—who believed they were talking to a boy. I feel like I am burning the history of the naked body that sits on the floor of my shower. The body that went to prom in a boxy tuxedo and coveted the gowns.
Because I am not a boy, but I am a woman who had a boyhood. I was, and am, made to live as a boy and I cannot suspend the perspective that gave me and join in when it’s time to fluster one of those clueless fuckers into anger by calling him a fuckboi and then tell him his anger proves he’s a fuckboi, or to humiliate one with an OKCupid screenshot because we’ve willfully conflated the clumsy ones with the threatening ones so we can grab those solidarity faves. It’s fucked up. It has metastasized.
Several transwomen have told me, privately, they they are uncomfortable with these things, but are afraid that speaking up about it would cause ciswomen to like and trust them less. “I play along,” one of them told me, “because in the queer community the only people who defend cisboys are cisboys. I don’t want to give up finally being read as a girl.”
Another says “I do the misandry stuff because it’s an easy way to earn queer cred points, but when I think about it it makes me uncomfortable.”
Another: “It’s a coping habit I’m not proud of. If I agree ‘girls rule boys drool’ it makes me feel more like a girl.”
Have you noticed, when a product is marketed in an unnecessarily gendered way, that the blame shifts depending on the gender? That a pink pen made “for women” is (and this is, of course, true) the work of idiotic cynical marketing people trying insultingly to pander to what they imagine women want? But when they make yogurt “for men” it is suddenly about how hilarious and fragile masculinity is — how men can’t eat yogurt unless their poor widdle bwains can be sure it doesn’t make them gay? #MasculinitySoFragile is aimed, with smug malice, at men—not marketers.
This conclusion—widely shared—is a product of insulated discourse. I am not saying “open the floodgates, let in the shitty male trolls!” I know the trolls—they have tried to be my friends, they have tried to sneak into feminist spaces with no desire to learn or listen. I understand not trusting men who loudly and constantly hold forth on women’s issues and refuse to accept when they are mistaken. I’m not encouraging anyone to trust blindly. I am pleading to the discoursers: consider that this insulation has effects and try to mitigate them, if your priority really is finding truth amid a muck of concealed patriarchal lies. Check to see if maybe you are saying things and reproducing things mostly because it sounds good and feels good and nobody is challenging them.
These are not discursive problems that only apply to an “undercover” transwoman, these are discursive problems that are seemingly only visible to an “undercover” transwoman forced to carry multiple perspectives like bactrian humps.
Because I am interested in complicating your definition of maleness and of boyhood. I was born into that shitty town, maleness, full of broken ideals and misplaced machismo and repression and there are some good people stuck living there. They are not in charge. They did not build it. And I don’t feel okay just moving out and saying “fuck y’all — bootstrap your way out or die out, I was never one of you.” I want to make it a better, healthier place—not spend all my time talking about how shitty it is and how anyone who would choose to live there deserves it. And to me that means considering them with charity, even when they make it difficult to.
This charity, of course, applies also to the many, many cis women I know who are well-meaning and supportive and still find themselves falling into the habits I’m describing. Most of the kindest and strongest people in my life, my dearest friends, are women—many of them ciswomen. If you’ve gotten this far and are feeling only that I should be spending more time acknowledging the struggles and frustration of cis women to temper my criticisms, know that I spend most of my time doing that. I could write a hundred pieces about the ways men and masculinity have damaged me and the women I love, but you could throw a stone into the internet and you’d probably hit one of those. This piece is about what I don’t get to say.
Because it’s not a small deal that the words “not all men” have become entwined inextricably with male fragility and whininess. It makes it awfully easy to insulate the (largely cis-)female perspective on what males are. To begin a statement with those words—“Not All Men”—is to give grounds to anyone who wants to laugh at the rest of it. But here is the truth: not all men are what you think they are. Man does not mean what you think it means. Generalizing harshly and broadly but implying “you know which ones I mean” is an intellectual and rhetorical laziness that is not allowed to pass anywhere else in these communities. Because we don’t get to choose who our words and behavior affect, we are obligated to choose them carefully.
Because I have been reduced to my appearance — to the way I present for my own well-being — by cisfeminists so often that I feel a fucked up Stockholm syndrome attachment to being misgendered. My dysmorphia is as entwined in my identity as anything else. I have lived with it for decades as a girl pretending to be a boy. And the nearer I get to something I’ve wanted my whole life, the more it feels like playing into the aesthetic politics of a group of people who reject me because of the associations they have with my body—a body which I cannot, ultimately, change very much. These people who will only be comfortable when I dilute those associations with femme signifiers.
As if maybe, by simply being what I am—a girl-feeling brain in a boy-looking body and boy-looking clothes—I might burn down something very important to them. Something that makes their life more comfortable and easy.
I can’t transition for me, though I dearly wish I could. Nothing I could do would alleviate more of my old problems than it would cause new. And I certainly won’t transition for them, to sort neatly into their system of what a woman looks like.
Because I didn’t get to decide what I am. I will be damned if anyone else does.
PS:
PLEASE, cis allies, realize that girls like this are among you and they are trying to bond with you over how much men suck. They are calling themselves feminists and they are commenting “yas!!!” on the neon vagina-centric art you reposted on Facebook.
What you want to say right now is “Not All Cis Women,” which is okay! Just also remember that feeling when you hear “Not All Men.”
Next Story — DoD Transgender Policy Changes
Currently Reading - DoD Transgender Policy Changes
25th Secretary of @DeptofDefense. Physics wonk and national security expert. Other interests include Medieval History, GPS and Protecting America.
Jun 309 min read
DoD Transgender Policy Changes
New Policy will End Ban on Transgender Americans in the United States Military
Today I announced some changes in the Defense Department’s policies regarding transgender servicemembers and I want to explain why. There are three main reasons — having to do with our future force, our current force, and matters of principle.
The first and fundamental reason is that the Defense Department and the military need to avail ourselves of all talent possible in order to remain what we are now — the finest fighting force the world has ever known.
Our mission is to defend this country, and we don’t want barriers unrelated to a person’s qualification to serve preventing us from recruiting or retaining the soldier, sailor, airman, or Marine who can best accomplish the mission. We have to have access to 100 percent of America’s population for our all-volunteer force to be able to recruit from among them the most highly qualified — and to retain them.
While there isn’t definitive data on the number of transgender servicemembers, the RAND Corporation looked at the existing studies out there and their best estimate was that about 2,500 people out of approximately 1.3 million active-duty servicemembers and about 1,500 out of approximately 825,000 reserve servicemembers are transgender, with the upper end of their range of estimates of around 7,000 in the active component and 4,000 in the reserves.
Although relatively few in number, we’re talking about talented and trained Americans who are serving their country with honor and distinction. We invest hundreds of thousands of dollars to train and develop each individual, and we want to take the opportunity to retain people whose talent we’ve invested in and who have proven themselves.
This brings me to the second reason, which is that the reality is that we have transgender servicemembers serving in uniform today, and I have a responsibility to them and their commanders to provide them both with clearer and more consistent guidance than is provided by current policies.
We owe commanders better guidance on how to handle questions such as deployment, medical treatment and other matters. And this is particularly true for small unit leaders, like our senior enlisteds and junior officers.
Also, right now, most of our transgender servicemembers must go outside the military medical system in order to obtain medical care that is judged by doctors to be necessary, and they have to pay for it out of their own pockets. This is inconsistent with our promise to all our troops that we will take care of them and pay for necessary medical treatment.
I and the Defense Department’s other senior leaders who have been studying this issue over the past year have met with some of these transgender servicemembers — they’ve deployed all over the world, serving on aircraft, submarines, forward operating bases, and right here in the Pentagon. And while I learned that in most cases their peers and local commanders have recognized the value of retaining high-quality people, I also learned that the lack of clear guidelines for how to handle this issue puts the commanders and the servicemembers in a difficult and unfair position.
One servicemember I met with described how some people had urged him to leave the military because of the challenges he was facing with our policies, and he said he just wouldn’t quit. He was too committed to the mission and this was where he wanted to be. These are the kind of people we want serving in our military.
The third and final reason for the change is a matter of principle. Americans who want to serve and can meet our standards should be afforded the opportunity to compete to do so. After all, our all-volunteer force is built upon having the most qualified Americans. And the profession of arms is based on honor and trust.
Army Chief of Staff General Milley recently reminded us of this, when he said, “The United States Army is open to all Americans who meet the standard, regardless of who they are. Embedded within our Constitution is that very principle, that all Americans are free and equal. And we as an Army are sworn to protect and defend that very principle. And we are sworn to even die for that principle. So if we in uniform are willing to die for that principle, then we in uniform should be willing to live by that principle.”
In view of these three reasons to change our policy, last July I directed the commencement of a study to identify the practical issues related to transgender Americans serving openly, and to develop an implementation plan that addresses those issues consistent with military readiness — because our mission, which is defending this country, has to come first.
I directed the working group to start with the presumption that transgender persons can serve openly without adverse impact on military effectiveness and readiness, unless and except where objective, practical impediments are identified.
It’s fair to say it’s been an educational process for a lot of people here in the Department, including me. We had to look carefully and deliberately at medical, legal, and policy considerations that have been evolving very rapidly in recent years, and we had to take into account the unique nature of military readiness and make sure we got it right. I’m proud of the thoughtful and deliberate manner in which the Department’s leadership pursued this review. I have been guided throughout by one central question: is someone the best qualified servicemember to accomplish our mission?
Let me now describe the process we used to study this over the last year.
The leadership of the armed services — together with personnel, training, readiness, and medical specialists from across the Department of Defense — studied the available data. We also had the RAND Corporation analyze relevant data and studies to help us with our review. And we got input from transgender servicemembers, from outside expert groups, and from medical professionals outside the Department.
We looked carefully at what lessons could be learned from the outside, including from allied militaries that already allow transgender servicemembers to serve openly, and from the private sector, because even though we’re not a business, and are different from a company in important ways, their experience and practices are still relevant.
It’s worth noting that at least 18 countries already allow transgender personnel to serve openly in their militaries. These include close allies such as the UK, Israel, and Australia, and we were able to study how they dealt with this issue.
We also saw that among doctors, employers, and insurance companies, providing medical care for transgender individuals is becoming common and normalized — in both public and private sectors alike. Today, over a third of Fortune 500 companies — including companies like Boeing, CVS, and Ford — offer employee health insurance plans with transgender-inclusive coverage. That’s up from zero companies in 2002. Similarly, non-discrimination policies at two-thirds of Fortune 500 companies now cover gender identity, up from just 3 percent in 2002. And for the public sector, all civilian federal employees have access to a health insurance plan that provides comprehensive coverage for transgender-related care and medical treatment. This represents a sea change from even just a decade ago.
Based on its analysis of allied militaries, and the expected rate at which American transgender servicemembers would require medical treatment that would impact their fitness for duty and deployability, RAND’s analysis concluded that there would be “minimal readiness impacts from allowing transgender servicemembers to serve openly.”
And in terms of cost, RAND concluded the health care costs would represent “an exceedingly small proportion” of DoD’s overall health care expenditures.
As a result of this year-long study, I’m announcing today that we are ending the ban on transgender Americans in the United States military. Effective immediately, transgender Americans may serve openly, and they can no longer be discharged or otherwise separated from the military just for being transgender.
Additionally, I have directed that the gender identity of an otherwise qualified individual will not bar them from military service, or from any accession program.
In taking these steps, we’re eliminating policies that can result in transgender servicemembers being treated differently from their peers based solely upon their gender identity rather than their ability to serve. And we’re confirming that, going forward, we will apply the same general principles, standards, and procedures to transgender servicemembers as we do to all servicemembers. What I heard from the transgender servicemembers I met with, overwhelmingly, was that they don’t want special treatment; rather, they want to be held to the same standards and be treated like everyone else.
As I directed, the study identified practical issues that arise with respect to transgender service. And it developed an implementation plan to address those issues.
Let me briefly describe that implementation plan:
These policies will be implemented in stages over the next 12 months — starting most immediately with guidance for current servicemembers and their commanders, and followed by training for the entire force, and then beginning to access new military servicemembers who are transgender. Implementation will begin today.
Starting today: Otherwise qualified servicemembers can no longer be involuntarily separated, discharged, or denied reenlistment or continuation of service just for being transgender.
Then, no later than 90 days from today: The Department will complete and issue both a commanders’ guidebook for leading currently-serving transgender servicemembers, and medical guidance to doctors for providing transition-related care if required to currently-serving transgender servicemembers. Our military treatment facilities will begin providing transgender servicemembers with all medically necessary care based on that medical guidance. Also starting on that date, servicemembers will be able to initiate the process to officially change their gender in our personnel management systems.
Next, over the 9 months that follow, based on detailed guidance and training materials that will be prepared, the services will conduct training of the force — from commanders, to medical personnel, to the operating force and recruiters.
When the training is complete, no later than one year from today, the military services will begin accessing transgender individuals who meet all standards — holding them to the same physical and mental fitness standards as everyone else who wants to join the military.
Our initial accession policy will require an individual to have completed any medical treatment that their doctor has determined is necessary in connection with their gender transition and to have been stable in their identified gender for 18 months, as certified by their doctor, before they can enter the military. I’ve directed that this accession standard be reviewed no later than 24 months from today to ensure it reflects what more we learn over the next two years as this is implemented as well as the most up to date medical knowledge.
I have discussed the implementation plan with our senior military leaders, including Chairman of the Joint Staff, General Dunford. The chiefs had specific recommendations about the timeline, and I made adjustments to the implementation plan timeline to incorporate those recommendations. The Chairman has indicated that the Services support the final implementation timeline that I’ve laid out today.
Overall, the policies we’re issuing today will allow us to access talent of transgender servicemembers to strengthen accomplishment of our mission, clarify guidance for commanders and military medical providers, and reflect better the Department’s and our nation’s principles.
I want to emphasize that deliberate and thoughtful implementation will be key. I and the senior leaders of the Department will therefore be ensuring that all issues identified in the study are addressed in implementation.
I am 100 percent confident in the ability of our military leaders and all our men and women in uniform to implement these changes in a manner that both protects the readiness of the force and also upholds values cherished by the military — honor, trust, and judging every individual on their merits.
I’m also confident that we have reason to be proud today of what this will mean for our military — because it’s the right thing to do, and it’s another step in ensuring that we continue to recruit and retain the most qualified people — and good people are the key to the best military in the world. Our military, and the nation it defends, will be stronger.
Next Story — Everybody Knows You Never Go Full Tranny
Currently Reading - Everybody Knows You Never Go Full Tranny
This week, news broke that Mark Ruffalo had produced a movie (Anything) co-starring Matt Bomer (a cisgender, gay man) as a transgender prostitute. When people asked why they a transgender person wasn’t cast, actress and transgender activist Jen Richards revealed that Ruffalo didn’t even consider anyone else for the role. Richards did audition for a part in the movie, but was turned down because she “doesn’t look trans enough.”
Ruffalo implied on twitter that he was surprised on twitter by this response, stating: “To the Trans community. I hear you. It’s wrenching to you see you in this pain. I am glad we are having this conversation. It’s time.”
No, we already had this conversation over two years ago with Jared Leto and the “Dallas Buyers Club.” The problem is that Mr. Ruffalo, wasn’t listening then, and it’s too late now given the movie is already in the can. They went ahead and made a movie about transgender people without actually having any cultural awareness of the history between the transgender community and cinema.
There’s so much wrong with this on so many levels. First, there’s the idea that transgender women are just buff, good looking dudes in women’s clothes and bad make-up. This also implies that who we are is performative, rather than actual. It implies that transgender women are really men, and should be treated as such. This leads to people disregarding the lived experiences of transgender people, and feeds into the narrative of the right wing narrative that being transgender is simply a “bad lifestyle choice.”
This movie is also going to reinforce the narrative that transgender women are sex workers, screwed up human wreckage worthy of pity, but never respect. In turn, transgender people are treated as sex objects, and as sex workers, thus suffering appalling levels of unemployment, poverty, and violence.
Speaking of poverty, there’s a callous indifference on stark display here. The conversation goes something like this:
Producers / Directors: It’s terrible how much poverty and discrimination there is against transgender people.
Transgender Actress: Well, if you cast some transgender people in trans roles, that would help keep some of us employed and out of poverty.
Producers / Directors: HA! You’re funny. I like you. No.
Worst of all, this sort of casting and stereotyping is just plain lazy. It is giving audiences what they expect, and what they want when it comes to transgender people. They expect us to look, and sound, like linebackers in house dresses stumbling around in high heels. They expect characters who are incompetent at not just make-up, but life in general. They want to watch portrayals of us as the flotsam and jetsam of society to feel better about themselves, the same way they watch “Hoarders.” The general public simply does not want the truth about transgender people, and when we fail to perform they get angry.
There are a few exceptions to how transgender characters and actors are treated, but they do demonstrate how successful such portrayals can be. “Her Story” with Jen Richards is amazing, and richly deserving of the Emmy it was nominated for based on how it handles real issues. “Sense8” by the Wachowski sisters succeeds in making a likable, competent transgender character for whom being transgender is just part of the back story, not the whole story. Even “Tangerine,” handled sex work in the transgender community well by making the characters fully developed, and highlighting how this wasn’t a choice: it was survival. (I also think the movie is Clerks for Millennials, which is about as high of praise as I can give).
I’m going to take a side step for a moment, though, to make a wider point. In 2008, the Movie “Tropic Thunder” came out and satirized lot of Hollywood tropes, including bad and offensive casting choices. Tropic Thunder features Robert Downey Jr. in black-face playing an African American soldier in a movie about Viet Nam. It also features Ben Stiller playing an actor whose career got way off track following a cringe-worthy performance as a mentally disabled man which attempted to pander to the Oscars. (Note: this was mocking Sean Penn’s actual cringe-worthy Oscar pandering in “I am Sam.”)
These two characters spawned some biting dialogue that is applicable to the situation today with Ruffalo and Bomer.
Kirk Lazarus (Downey): Everybody knows you never go full retard.
Kirk Lazarus (Downey): Check it out. Dustin Hoffman, ‘Rain Man,’ look retarded, act retarded, not retarded. Counted toothpicks, cheated cards. Autistic, sho’. Not retarded. You know Tom Hanks, ‘Forrest Gump.’ Slow, yes. Retarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won a ping-pong competition. That ain’t retarded. Peter Sellers, “Being There.” Infantile, yes. Retarded, no. You went full retard, man. Never go full retard. You don’t buy that? Ask Sean Penn, 2001, “I Am Sam.” Remember? Went full retard, went home empty handed…
“Anything” combines two of the worst of the excesses lampooned by Tropic Thunder. It includes the modern version of blackface (transface), and pandering for Oscars by playing “pathetic” characters of a particular class of people. Thus, I propose that a new term for what “Anything” is doing:
“Going full tranny” (And yes, “tranny” is every bit as offensive as “retard”)
And what do I mean by “full tranny”? Like the Bechdel Test, there are conditions:
1. Cisgender actor playing a transgender person
2. The character is not “passable” in their gender presentation
3. Character is a sex worker (or other demeaning work)
4. Character’s is worthy of pity, but not respect
Given Bomer’s physique, given the obvious Oscar pandering happening here, and given Ruffalo’s appalling ignorance of the history between the transgender community and how they are portrayed in movies, I am confident that this movie will have Bomer going “full tranny.”
In the end, I expect that people will look back at “Anything” the way they do “I am Sam,” where the conventional wisdom of Hollywood exclaims, “Everybody knows you never go full tranny.”
Sometimes, your purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning to others. Bomer and Ruffalo may have found their calling.
Next Story — Making Movies With Transgender Protagonists Is Not, On Its Own, Progress.
Currently Reading - Making Movies With Transgender Protagonists Is Not, On Its Own, Progress.
Making Movies With Transgender Protagonists Is Not, On Its Own, Progress.
In the last week, two new films with transgender protagonists were announced. The reception of both films by the transgender community has been predictably frosty with the same accusations leveled against these films as have been against other movies with transgender main characters.
One movie called “Re Assignment” (which had previously operated under the title ‘Tomboy’…no, seriously) follows the story of an assassin who, during the events of the movie, transitions from male to female.
According to IMDB, the catalyst for the movie’s plot is an unwanted gender reassignment surgery performed by Sigourney Weaver on the main character, Frank Kitchen (played by Michele Rodriguez). Frank then begins a bloody quest for revenge as anybody who is unwillingly placed into a gender not-of-their-own probably would. Ironically, it’s an unintended detail that the transgender community can sympathize with.
The other film, this one by Mark Ruffalo is the story of a transgender sex worker named “Freda” in a new movie starring Matt Bomer titled ‘Anything’.
Eddie Redmayne doing….whatever the fuck it is he’s doing here.
It would be easy for this author to pick apart the details of both films and hold each up for their portrayal of stereotypical trans people doing stereotypically trans-y things, but the transgender community has already scoped out both films and is doing a marvelous job of sniping those details without my help.
Instead, I’ll focus on a different aspect that has become commonplace not just in support of these two films, but has also been used in other movies in recent memory; the assertion that movies like this are great progressive achievements.
In case anyone is still wondering, no. Neither of these films will be masterpieces in progressive ideology despite the fact that they will likely be hailed that way upon their release. In the past, we have seen movies like “The Danish Girl” be praised tremendously for their ‘progressive’ portrayals of transgender main characters.
“I hope ‘The Danish Girl’ makes trans lives better” star of The Danish Girl, Eddie Redmayne said of his movie. It’s a beautiful sentiment to hold that you may help someone through your art, and in some ways “The Danish Girl” did break some boundaries in film. But it wasn’t as dramatic a breakthrough as it could have been.
It’s true that the stories of transgender people have been virtually ignored entirely up until a few years ago, and it’s true that it’s a bold first step for Hollywood to decide that there’s a safe market for telling these stories. But like any art form that targets a specific group of people and intends to tell their stories through an artistic medium, sometimes it’s hard to tell when, if, and how art should imitate life.
Oftentimes, movies like “The Danish Girl” are less ‘bold statements’ and more ‘cheap opportunism’. The Danish Girl had hit theaters in October of 2015, only 7 months after Caitlyn Jenner came out of the closet and lit headlines ablaze with transgender visibility. What’s marketable for Hollywood are in many cases stories that make use of something topical. It’s no surprise that Hollywood scriptwriters would want to tap into something new and interesting in order to fill theater seats.
Hollywood has an obvious incentive to tell these stories, but even with well intentioned actors like Eddie Redmaye, it can also be exploitative if artists aren’t careful. The trouble is that if you want to make art that truly imitates life, then you have to do it in such a way that it actually imitates something real.
One criticism being used against movies like this is that they opt not to use real transgender actors and actresses, likely because the names of transgender performers aren’t as well known and bring far less star power than a Jeffrey Tambor or a Jared Leto would. This is where the whole ‘art imitating life’ thing goes wrong first.
In the old days of film, it would have been necessary perhaps for a movie to feature a character of color. Social stigmas in the past gave rise to ugly gimmicks like ‘black face’ where better known white actors would play black characters for some of the same reasons that transgender performers aren’t used today. It’s true that trans performers aren’t blackballed the way that black performers were during the days of blackface, the absence of trans performers creates the same effect.
More recently, there has been controversy over the use of Tilda Swinton in the new Dr. Strange film coming out soon by Marvel studios. To the confusion of many, Swinton was cast to play an Asian man. Can Swinton pull off the role? Probably, but it speaks more to Swinton’s depth as an actress than it does her experiential suitability for such a role. And even with her capability in acting, it’s still a bit of a distraction.
This particular wall is finally being breached by some talented actors and actresses who have managed to make names for themselves in entertainment. For example, Laverne Cox, of ‘Orange Is The New Black’ fame will be starring as the ‘sweet transvestite from transsexual Transylvania’, Dr. Frank-N-Furter, in the upcoming TV performance of The Rocky Horror Picture Show. Her performance is sure to be a much more groundbreaking event for the transgender community than Bomer or Rodriguez’ characters will.
It’s easy to dismiss the concerns of the trans community as idle lip-quivering at a problem that doesn’t really exist. Yes, there are still starving kids in Africa, and yes, there are a million other problems in the world that are subjectively more important than the plight of transgender stories being told in TV shows and movies. But society sees us through the stories that Hollywood tells. It is because of this impact that producers should at least try to make movies as authentic as possible by consulting transgender writers and using transgender actors whenever possible.
It’s Hollywood’s prerogative to do whatever they think is best for their industry. The trans community doesn’t get to have permission granting authority over movies that are made, or how they are made, but if Hollyood wants to pay homage to the lives of trans people, production teams need to refocus, spend less time on the window-dressing “progressive tour de force” and more time studying people…real people.
I wasn’t really prepared for constant pain — I just haven’t experienced it before. It’s a nagging part of your conscious, something you can’t ignore yet have to ignore. It drags on your mind, constantly telling you that you can’t do what you’re doing right now, you’re in pain. Ignoring it is against your nature; pain exists for a reason. The higher brain functions tell you it’s expected, and you should do something else.
When you’re preparing for genital surgery, you expect to be out of commission a while. You get the orders from the doctor that you’re going to be on leave for eight weeks for recovery and you don’t understand. You think you’ll spend the first couple weeks healing quickly and then things will be better and you will start feeling real again, and then you’ll.. start working from home, or you can start living some semblance of a life once you are past the worst of it.
I’m three weeks post-surgery now and my life is about pain, distraction, and management. A huge part of my day is taken up by thinking out when I’ll take the pills that I use so that I can keep the pain down to noticeable, but not incapacitating. 1800mg of ibuprofen, in three doses: breakfast, lunch and dinner. I move my lunch and dinner later in the day so that the doses are spread out, and separate from my other pain medication which I take 6am, noon, 6pm, and midnight religiously.
I was prescribed Percocet, up to one every 4 hours, for the last three weeks. I’ve been advised that I should start taking less. In the last week I’ve successfully gone to every six hours, and then started splitting it with Tylenol. I hope that I can switch completely off it by a month post-surgery. A friend was completely off pain medication at about a month.
Opiates are interesting. They have a strong effect on my mood but I don’t notice. Maybe it is a history of not paying attention to my own body. I was a good girl; I never tried to use mind-altering drugs before. So I don’t recognize the signs of being “overly happy” or how to adjust for the drop that comes when stopping. I’ve had to deal with that a couple of times now, and it’s unpleasant to say the least, especially when you’re in pain.
Netflix is a godsend. Watching what you want, or a revisit to the ones you’ve loved in the past, are a good distraction. Video games too — they activate your brain in a way that passive entertainment doesn’t. I’d like to do things with my hands, weaving or cross-stitch, but moving around is sometimes tricky and can trigger some pain.. Sometimes it’s okay, sometimes it’s not.
At three weeks, I’m able to meet with friends, go on walks, plan things outside the house. I understand I’m doing well. I plan on going and doing things, but run the risk of doing too much, crawling back home hoping that you haven’t soiled your clothes and trying to decide if it’s worth disrupting your schedule so that you can push against the pain just a little longer.
The pain persists though, through the medication you take to keep it at bay. You sleep and you wake up in pain. You get lunch in pain. You watch shows in pain. You play games in pain. You talk to friends in pain. You take a walk in pain. Take a nap in pain. Wake up in pain.
It’s always there. Telling you that something is wrong, that you need to deal with something. The frustrating part is that there’s nothing to do about it. You just have to sit and wait, and know that tomorrow you’ll have an indiscernibly smaller amount of it. You hope in a week you will have a lot less of it.
Despite all this pain, I have had no regrets. I cry a lot nowadays, and most of it is because the pain reminds me that something is righting itself in the world now. That I’ll never again have to deal with the psychological pain of having a penis. I’ll never break down and try to forcibly remove it or cry myself to sleep because I can’t get comfortable with my genitals flopping around outside my body.
This pain is temporary, even if it seems never-ending. That change is permanent.
Sign up to continue reading what matters most to you