I questioned the Trans narrative on Twitter and was told I should kill myself… It was interesting.

FULL DISCLOSURE: THIS REPRESENTS MY OPINIONS — NOT NECESSARILY FACTS; I AM OPEN TO DEBATE, BUT PLEASE ONLY SHARE PERSPECTIVES WHICH ARE EXPLICIT IN THIER DEFINITIONS OF THINGS. E.G. IF YOU HATE “GENITAL-BASED” DEFINITIONS OF WOMEN, DON’T BOTHER SHARING UNLESS YOU CARE TO STATE WHAT YOU BELIEVE THE DEFINITIONS OF WOMEN, MEN, TRANS, ETC. SHOULD BE. AND BE OPEN TO DISCUSSION — DON’T ASSUME PEOPLE OWE IT TO YOU TO TAKE YOUR DEFINTIION AT FACE VALUE WITHOUT A LITTLE PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS; I CERTAINLY WOULDN’T ASK YOU TO TAKE MY DEFINITIONS AT FACE VALUE WITHOUT SOME EXPLANANTION.

Also, I don’t know if you need a trigger warning or not… So just to be safe:

TRIGGER WARNING: THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HEREIN MIGHT TRIGGER YOU.

I’m honestly just kind of…perplexed. Or shocked? I mean, definitely intrigued… It was very very interesting. Because I was told to kill myself, but when I told the guy, stop projecting, he blocked me. And I’m like, Oh shit… Did that dude want to kill himself? Damn. (Sorry)

And then I realized: YO, these liberal women out here really are wreckless! Like, DONALD TRUMP wreckless. As in, one girl I got into an argument with said: Women can’t be defined by vaginas. Vaginas aren’t offensive, but defining a woman as someone who has a vagina is offensive. (And I’m like, to whom!?!!?!?) I mean, personally, I’m pretty fucking offended by you NOT defining women by their vaginas, but whatevs.

Let’s give her the benefit of the doubt.

So I say, OK then, well how would you define a ‘Woman”? And she of course gives me: Anyone who views themselves as a woman. And I’m like… Well, what does it mean to view oneself as a woman? And she’s like, You can’t define it — it’s a gender term, and you can have gender neutral, gender fluid, nonbinary etc… And I’m like, wait, OK, hold up. Where are we getting this: Woman is a gender term nonsense from? Like really, how do we define words like Woman? Man? Male? Female? Child? Adult? Girl? Boy? Are we on a path — like, no wait, ARE LIBERALS ACTUALLY OUT HERE ARGUING THAT THE TRUE DEFINITION OF A WORD NO LONGER MATTERS???? IS THAT WHAT MY “INTELLECTUAL” LIBERAL “BROTHERS AND SISTERS” ARE ARGUING???? ARE WE REALLY ARGUING THAT HUNDREDS — POSSIBLY THOUSANDS — OF YEARS’ WORTH OF HISTORY NO LONGER PROVIDE A RELEVANT CONTEXT WITHIN WHICH WE SHOULD BE DEFINING THE TERMS WOMAN AND MAN!?!?!? Did I miss something? In any case, aside from that, she said Woman was a gender term. Can we at least agree masculine and feminine and fluid are gender terms? OK — well, “woman is a gender term” would at least fit SOMEWHERE on the spectrum. I’M NOT FUCKING ASSERTING WHERE IT SHOULD GO, I’M MERELY ASKING: IF ‘WOMAN’ IS A ‘GENDER TERM’ — THEN WHAT DOES THE TERM MEAN! THAT’S

WHAT IT MEANS TO HAVE A MEANING (<<<How’s that for glib, eh?)

You don’t get to talk out your asshole as much as you please and call it “feminism”. If you can’t even define who you are, you don’t have any insight to share, no wisdom to share, no little nuggets of enlightenment which come from the most random of places…. These nice little bits of logic that GENUINELY AUTHENTICALLY SHED LIGHT on a person’s perspective — that’s how EMPATHY is created, you know?? I know I come across as mean, but I’m angry. And that’s part of my message. What’s your message? What have you got to share? If it’s nothing, then shut up and listen, you might learn a thing or two, now and then.

Without attaining some insight, how are you going to define your goals in any movement? Personally, I feel I can sympathize with many of the issues trans women face. But I can sympathize with many of the issues black people face. It doesn’t mean I can claim I’m black, and it doesn’t mean I get to redefine what it means to be black; and it doesn’t mean that I get to feel excluded because of either those things. It means that I should be helpful and loving enough to support them when our interests aren’t mutually exclusive. And when they ARE mutually exclusive, then I should be considerate enough of them being butthurt about it, and sit down and discuss things until we can come to a compromise. And I think that’s what’s missing in the trans dialogue in my eyes: Compromise. It’s like, “Excuse you, you don’t get to tell me whether or not I’m a woman. You don’t get to define what a woman is. We each get to define ourselves!” I’ve literally had those things written to me tonight… And I could only think: WHAT DON’T YOU UNDERSTAND ABOUT ALTERNATIVE FACTS? LIKE… FOR REAL. YOU get to define your GENDER IDENTITY — I.E. WHERE YOU FIT ON THE GENDER SPECTRUM. SOCIETY has ALREADY chosen your sex for you. Unless you’ve had a sex change. But my point is this: YOU WANT YOUR SEX IDENTITY TO REMAIN SECRET — WHY???? WHY SHOULD ANYONE CARE WHAT YOUR SEX IDENTITY IS? YOU WANT TO REMOVE BOUNDARIES, BUT YET YOU WANT EVERYTHING TO REMAIN HUSH-HUSH. WHAT ARE WE ASHAMED OF? SERIOUSLY.

So basically, do I have a problem with “chicks with dicks” nah man, to be honest, sometimes I’m like…Is that kinda hot to me right now? Cool. And other times I’m like, OMG WE HAVE SO MUCH IN COMMON, WE’RE GONNA BE BESTIES FOR LIFE… And other times I’m like, if these mothafuckin’ men don’t get the fuck out this march…. Just like I’ve seen you trans women out here talkin’ shit on these broke-down lookin women trying to hate on you… We have love and hate for each other and we talk shit on each other. But we cannot oppress each other, and to refrain from oppressing one another in a manner that’s respectful and MEANINGFUL, I’m sorry ‘cause I know it’s complicated, but we really need to talk about it. Like literally define a new culture. And you can’t claim victim everytime someone says something YOU think is offensive. You have to be able to reason why we — cis women — should find it offensive, even if we claim to support you blindly, then we have to define together. But we have to define, define, define.

Because seriously what I saw tonight was — and I’m not kidding you — very scary. How are we THIS narcissistic. Like, yet I too am a narcissist — most Americans are to some degree because we can afford that luxury. Seriously, it wasn’t until maybe the past 8 years while we had one of the most charming couples in the white house ever, we were suddenly being told our country is the pits. Before that all we grew up hearing was: America, we the greatest. But that entitlement has spoiled our psyche rotten!!!

These people have no clue what they want or what they hope for. It’s just a constant state of misery and I’m starting to believe it’s because it’s LITERALLY 1984. I mean at this point, I would bet you could convince everyone we’re actually in the year 1984, 2017 is a big conspiracy, astronomy is fake, the world is flat… God damn it. Even the liberals have been infected. That’s what I learned tonight. Liberals are JUST AS COMFORTABLE severing words from their meanings just because (and ONLY WHEN) it suits their immediate interests. Of course there are exceptions! Of course! But damn are they few and far between.

This is what I see from the election:

The Right didn’t like Bernie Sanders because they can’t tell the difference between a ‘Socialist’ and a “Socialist” (ACTIONS, PEOPLE. THEY SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS, I HEAR)

The Left didn’t like Bernie Sanders because he was too old, wanted taxpayer funding to go toward college and healthcare, and apparently demonstrated he hated women by running against Hillary Clinton.

Libertarians, Independents and true Liberal Intellectuals didn’t want Hillary because — she was a woman, yes — but also a woman who happens to be the matriarch of a politically-motivated oligarchic outfit which has been laundering money for years.

Republicans? Oh… Yeah, no they didn’t want her cause she’s woman. No, that’s all.

But then there were those Liberals who couldn’t quite get a taste for the true flavor of the political climate in this country… And I can’t think of any real reason aside from: They just didn’t want to, and they weren’t too worried about it. So they like, REALLY rooted for Hillary. (Meanwhile, I’m like, Liberals are out here arguing woman isn’t a sex term — that it’s a gender term, but women can’t be defined using gender terms — and YOU REALLY THOUGHT THIS COUNTRY WAS READY FOR A WOMAN PRESIDENT????)

Which party sounds more idiotic? They both sound dumb as fuck.

Because immediately after the primaries, all the sudden Liberals got scared — not the hold-outs — but the ones who suddenly felt like losing Bernie’s energy was really felt. It was a little worrisome. And now all the sudden, the stakes seemed much higher knowing Trump had picked up steam…. In other words, they realized they liked Bernie better all along, which is STILL not a good reason to vote for someone…unless you’re a republican.

To that end…

Those very same people on the Right who claimed to like Bernie’s character, but disliked his socialist stance so much they claimed they wouldn’t vote for him… What, hold on a second… Who was the socialist they used to act as the face, intent, application, and outcome of ALL forms of socialism throughout the world? I could have sworn that was Hitler…. All those people who said, they really like Bernie as a person, they just can’t in good conscience elect a socialist for president…

But wait, I thought Trump openly embraces white nationalism… I thought Trump’s whole platform was based on doing what’s best for our country — HOW HAVE Y’ALL REALLY NOT FIGURED OUT YET THAT “NATION”, “COUNTRY” — THOSE TERMS TO THESE GUYS MEAN ‘STATE.’ The GOVERNMENT. They don’t care about YOOOOUUUU. They care about the state. To them, it’s a source of income; a corporation… That’s actually fascism… Like we’re living under the very definition of a fascist dictatorship right now. And don’t get mad, but read both about Liberal Fascism and the conservative sects — we can both fuck up basically. Liberalism doesn’t entitle you to claim you’re intelligent. On the contrary! It REQUIRES YOU TO PROVE THAT YOU ARE INTELLIGENT. Or at least that’s what we like to tell ourselves… Right?

But Liberals are all like: I HATE TRUMP! I HATE TRUMP!! WOMEN’S RIGHTS!! WOMEN’S RIGHTS!!! NO VAGINAS!! NO VAGINAS!!! VAGINA SIGNS OFFEND!!! VAGINA SIGNS OPPRESS! WOMEN IS A GENDER TERM!! YOU CAN’T DEFINE THE TERM!! NO! YOU CAN’T DEFINE IT!! WHAT DO YOU MEAN WOMEN DON’T EXIST!! WHAT DO YOU MEAN IT DOESN’T MEAN ANYTHING!

I GET TO DEFINE MY OWN GENDER IDENTITY! I GET TO DEFINE MY OWN SEX IDENTITY! I GET TO DEFINE ! I GET TO DEFINE IT! I GET TO DEFINE EVERYTHING! I DEFINE IT ALL! I DEFINE YOU! I DEFINE ME! I DEFINE HER! SHE! SHE’S OFFENSIVE! I DON’T WANT GENDERED TERMS! GENDER FLUID MEANS NOTHIGN EVERYTHING IS GENDER! WE ARE EVERYTHING! I AM IN YOU! YOU IN ME! WE’RE THE SAME! ….Wait? What? You have separate/opposing viewpoints from mine? I HATE YOU!!! YOU’RE NOT REAL!!! I DEFINE YOU AND I DEFINE YOU AS A BAD PERSON! GET AWAY FROM ME! I BANISH YOU!!! And so on and so forth….

And so…. Words used to be this very convenient tool we could use to define things. And defining things allowed us to communicate better. And it allowed us to interact with people — even those people from faraway lands whom we did not know. We could use words, common phrases or expressions, little pieces of information we could use to convey things like humor, friendship, love, hate, our sense of self. All sorts of things. And ah, what a marvelous time that must have been…. But unfortunately, I’ve realized, I don’t live in those times now, and I probably never have.

But let me just say something: When words serve as little packets of information — not random bits of nonsense which you and only you can know or understand (by your own admission!!! like, you’re TOTALLY comfortable with this, some of you….liberals!!!) — when we can all agree on definitions of words, ESPECIALLY those carrying such a lengthy, detailed, and IMPORTANT historical message bottled up within it, such as ‘Woman’ (‘women’; ‘females’; feminine’; misogyny; vagina…etc.), then we can communicate SO MUCH more quickly, and waste SO MUCH LESS time being offended. OF COURSE YOU’RE ALL OFFENDED — BECAUSE YOU EACH SAY YOU ARE ENTITLED TO YOUR OWN DEFINITION OF GENDER EXPRESSION, YET YOU APPARENTLY FORGOT THAT MIGHT IMPLY YOU’D HAVE TO BE TOLERANT OF EVERYONE ELSE’S INDIVIDUAL DEFINITIONS.

Words are, by contrast, relatively objective — in theory, at least. And so, it’s at least a little strange to me that we’d be so comfortable with relieving words of their meaning — and call that progressivism. Also, why would republicans be comfortable with a man who wants to defund public schools… I thought you voted for him because you wanted him to take care of the middle and lower classes — coal country or something. Not those big ol’ city dwellin’ folk who like ni**rs and they’re all a bunch of whores, they don’t know Hillary’s a reptile — but TRUMP is definitely not… He’s SOOOOOO relatable to me, from here, in the back country, in my trailer… I’m drinkin’ a beer. Trump would love it here… (no he wouldn’t. he doesn’t like you. he doesn’t like anyone. least of all himself…. so he’s not even “cool.”)

On the other hand, why are liberals all the sudden not self-proclaimed “Grammar Nazis” whenever it comes to defining Woman and Man? Huh? Like, for real… Did you guys not know what the definition of grammar is? ???

Or do you not care…really. lolz

In any case, long story short: I shouldn’t use twitter; tonight was a disappointment; but I think I learned a lot… although I’m not exactly sure because any time I tripped up a Liberal argument that didn’t make sense (like I’m actually not kidding at all, it was quite sad and depressing… LIKE NO SENSE!!!!!!!!!! THERE WAS NOT ANY LOGIC — NO PROCESS TREE — NO DEFINITION OF ANY KIND BECAUSE APPARENTLY EVEN LIBERALS THINK DEFINITIONS AND FACTS ARE ACTUALLY JUST “DEFINITIONS” AND “FACTS”!!!!!! GOD DAMN! IT FUCKING HURTS!!!!!!)

EVEN THOUGH LIBERAL ARGUMENTS DIDN’T MAKE ANY SENSE AT ALL, I was accused of twisting words to change their meanings…. Like, by me saying:

So, Woman is not a sex term?

No.

And it’s offensive to say I’m a woman because I have a vagina?

Yes.

OK, so Woman is a gender term?

Yes.

OK, so what about gender does it define?

What?

Well, you said it’s a gender term… And like… Wait, do you not know what the definition of ‘term’ is? Or did you think it meant “term” — like, YOU get to decide its definition…

UUUUUUGH A WOMAN IS ANYONE WHO FEELS SHE’S A WOMAN A MAN IS ANYONE WHO FEELS HE’S A MAN WHAT DON’T YOU GET YOUR TRANSPHOBIA IS SHOWING

And I’m like, Hold up: You sound fuckin’ retarded. You expect me to kowtow to YOU? Now what would that say about our society, if I did that? I’m supposed to just let you off — you’re using all sorts of words you clearly have no interest in understanding — let alone defining — and I’M the one with the problem?? YOU MUSTA LOST YOUR GOT DAMN MIND.

Like, OK, OK — MAYBE words don’t “really” “mean” “anything” after all… After all, what does it really mean to ‘mean’ something? Amirite?

But TERMS — well, TERMS should mean something… Right? Like, by virtue of their very definition… A ‘Term’ — to those of us still “in the know” means a word used to DEFINE something… So if ‘Woman’ is a gender TERM…. then… it should define… SOMETHING? Right?

No?

No… OK…. Well… Then fuck you.

Yeah… Any time THAT happened, those bitches blocked me. That’s progressivism? You can’t articulate ANYTHING OF ANY VALUE. You can’t convey a THOROUGH understanding of this thing for which you claim to be advocating, and YOU feel offended???

So in summation: Liberals, do better.

Buy the book 1984.

And read it.

And any word you find you’re unsure of its meaning…google it on your fucking iPhone you lazy piece of shit faux intellectual.

FUCK OUTTA HEA!!!

Doublespeak: Doublespeak is language that deliberately obscures, disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words. Doublespeak may take the form of euphemisms (e.g., “downsizing” for layoffs, “servicing the target” for bombing), in which case it is primarily meant to make the truth sound more palatable. It may also refer to intentional ambiguity in language or to actual inversions of meaning. In such cases, doublespeak disguises the nature of the truth. Doublespeak is most closely associated with political language.

IT MAY ALSO REFER TO INTENTIONAL AMBIGUITY IN LANGUAGE OR TO ACTUAL INVERSIONS OF MEANING.

IN SUCH CASES, DOUBLESPEAK DISGUISES THE NATURE OF THE TRUTH.