States have used taxpayer money to buy systems from vendors with close past and/or present ties to a foreign dictator, US politicians, a Religious Right group, and a convicted embezzler whose crimes involved computer tampering.
By Jennifer Cohn @jennycohn1
January 28, 2018
Sequoia (acquired by Dominion Voting Systems in 2010) and Smartmatic
- Sequoia Voting Systems is one of the largest voting machine companies in the United States.
2. In 2005, Sequoia was acquired by a voting machine firm called “Smartmatic.” The acquisition raised eyebrows in the U.S. because, in 2004, the Hugo Chavez-led Venezuelan government had selected Smartmatic “to provide the voting machines system for the presidential recall election, even though it would have been the company’s first time providing machines for an election.” https://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/smartmatic-announces-sale-sequoia-voting-systems
3. “Smartmatic teamed up with a Venezuelan software company, Bitza, which at the time was 28 percent owned by Chavez’s government.” https://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/smartmatic-announces-sale-sequoia-voting-systems
4. According to the Congressional testimony of a CIA agent, the 2004 election and recount in Venezuela appeared to have been rigged for Chavez. The agent further stated that Chavez controlled all of the voting equipment before the election. Although not mentioned by the CIA agent expressly, this would have included Smartmatic’s voting machines. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/article24530650.html
5. The concerns over Smartmatic’s acquisition of Sequoia triggered an investigation in the United States. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/washington/29ballot.html
6. In December 2006, presumably due to the controversy, Smartmatic announced that it had sold Sequoia. https://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/smartmatic-announces-sale-sequoia-voting-systems
7. But questions remained as to whether the sale was a sham transaction designed to fool regulators. https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/itl/vote/SequoiaSmartmaticReport61208.pdf
8. In 2007, the California Secretary of State asked the Computer Security Group at U.C. Santa Barbara to analyze the security of Sequoia’s voting machines. The report found “a number of serious security issues” that “could be exploited by a determined attacker to modify (or invalidate) the results of an election” and that could “be carried out without any knowledge of the source code.” http://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/oversight/ttbr/red-sequoia.pdf
9. An analysis of the source code by @mattblaze and others at UC Berkeley found that “the Sequoia system lacks effective safeguards against corrupted or malicious data injected onto removable media, especially for devices entrusted to poll workers and other temporary staff with limited authority…” http://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/oversight/ttbr/sequoia-source-public-jul26.pdf
10. The researchers further found that “Many of the security features of the Sequoia system, particularly those that protect the integrity of precinct results, employ cryptography” that is “easily circumvented.” http://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/oversight/ttbr/sequoia-source-public-jul26.pdf
11. The researchers concluded that “virtually every important software security mechanism is vulnerable to circumvention.” https://www.wired.com/2007/08/ca-releases-sou/
12. Based on these reports, California withdrew approval for the use of Sequoia machines, but then granted re-approval for the use of Sequoia’s machines subject to various conditions. http://www.govtech.com/security/California-Decertifies-Voting-Machines-Conditions-Applied.html
13. Thirteen other states states continued using Sequoia machines as well. https://www.theverge.com/2012/11/6/3609506/voting-machine-electronic-voting-history-in-america
14. One of those states was New York, which in 2008 revealed that it had “found problems with 50 percent of the roughly 1,500 ImageCast optical-scan machines (shown in the video above) that Sequoia Voting Systems has delivered to the state so far…” https://www.wired.com/2008/07/ny-50-percent-o/
15. The year before, Sequoia was identified as the company that had supplied the notorious faulty punch cards during the 2000 election — the very punch cards that led Congress to pass legislation moving the country away from punch cards and toward electronic voting machines. Several former workers told Dan Rather that Sequoia had changed the paper stock before the election and knew in advance the punch cards would cause problems. https://www.wired.com/2007/08/sequoia-voting/
16. In 2010, a Canadian company called “Dominion Voting” bought Sequoia and some of the assets of another major player in the voting machine business, Diebold Election Systems (which was renamed “Premier” in 2007). https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voting-systems/vendors/sequoia-voting-systems/
I discuss both Smartmatic and Dominion (a privately held company) in further detail later in this article.
Diebold Election Systems/Premier (previously called “Global Election Systems”)
17. Before its assets were sold to Dominion, Diebold was the second largest voting machine vendor in the U.S. (The largest was ES&S discussed later in this article.) https://www.wired.com/2009/09/diebold-sells/
18. In 2004, Diebold was estimated to control about 50% of the electronic voting market. http://money.cnn.com/2004/08/30/technology/election_diebold/ …
19. Diebold entered the voting machine business with its 2002 acquisition of Global Election Systems, a company whose Senior VP (programmer Jeffrey Dean) was a CONVICTED FELON who had served time for sophisticated crimes involving “COMPUTER TAMPERING”.
https://www.wired.com/2003/12/con-job-at-diebold-subsidiary/ [“According to a public court document released before GES hired him, Dean served time in a Washington state correctional facility for stealing money and tampering with computer files in a scheme that ‘involved a high degree of sophistication and planning.’”];
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/feb/02/houseofcommons.society [“Stephenson also discovered that Jeffrey Dean, the senior programmer of the Diebold Gems central tabulator system counting a third of the votes in the Bush-Kerry election in 37 states, has a police record. He pleaded guilty to 23 counts of embezzlement involving sophisticated manipulation of computer accounting records.”]
20. Global brought on Dean shortly before the 2000 election. A few months later, it hired a convicted drug trafficker — who Dean met in prison — to oversee punch card printing. https://people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/voting/press/2004-04%20Vanity%20Fair%20-%20Hack%20The%20Vote.pdf … … …
21. As reported in some (or all) of the above stories, Dean’s criminal past and relationship to Global/Diebold were discovered by election integrity advocate and “Black Box Voting” author Beverly Harris.
22. Here is a copy of the SEC filing (obtained by Harris) showing that Dean was Global’s largest shareholder in 2001.
23. Here is an excerpt from Dean’s sentencing document, also obtained by Beverly Harris.
24. Diebold told the AP that Dean left the company in 2002. http://blackboxvoting.org/bbv_chapter-14.pdf … … …
25. But Harris obtained Dean’s court file, which included internal Diebold memos showing that Dean remained as a Diebold consultant.
26. According to Wired, Dean “wrote & maintained…code used to count hundreds of thousands of votes.” https://www.wired.com/2003/12/con-job-at-diebold-subsidiary/ … …
27. According to the Guardian, Dean also programmed the GEMS central tabulator system, which counted one third of the votes in 37 states in 2004. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2005/feb/02/houseofcommons.society … … …
28. In 2004, Diebold was estimated to control about 50% of the electronic voting market. http://money.cnn.com/2004/08/30/technology/election_diebold/ …
29. According to the non-partisan election integrity group @VoterGA, Georgia’s Election Board and Attorney General “were given a copy of the conviction papers for Jeffrey Dean but took no action.”
30. Because elected officials and news organizations never followed up on Dean’s whereabouts, we can only speculate as to when (if at all) Dean’s relationship with the company ended.
31. As discussed above, Dominion bought Sequoia and some of Diebold/Premier’s assets in 2010. Note the name of the Dominion spokesperson in this article; I do not know if there is a relationship. http://news.abs-cbn.com/nation/05/07/10/source-code-firm-dominion-sheds-light-voting-glitch
32. Meanwhile, Diebold, Inc.’s CEO (Walden O’Dell) — who made the decision to acquire Global back in 2002 — was a member of Bush’s Rangers & Pioneers, an elite group of loyalists who … raised at least $100,000 each for the 2004 race.” that http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/09/business/machine-politics-in-the-digital-age.html …
33. According to the New York Times, Diebold’s executives donated exclusively to the Republican party in 2003. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/09/business/machine-politics-in-the-digital-age.html …
34. The president of Diebold’s Election Division at that time was Bob Urosevich. Bob Urosevich had previously been president of Global and also had founded another major player in the voting machine market, Election Systems & Software (“ES&S”) of Nebraska. He founded ES&S with his brother, Todd Urosevich, who remained at ES&S as a Senior vice president.
https://www.verifiedvoting.org/resources/voting-equipment/premier-diebold/accuvote-tsx/ … [“Diebold acquired Global Election Systems (GES) in January 2002. GES was renamed Diebold Election Systems (DES), and Robert Urosevich, who had been President of GES, became the CEO of DES.”]
http://www.omaha.com/columnists/kelly/kelly-this-omaha-company-shaped-how-america-counts-its-election/article_459030e0-b522-5a7b-b953-1e6c958e5439.html [Bob Urosevich founded ES&S under the name “DataMark,” received “an infusion of capital from .. California billionaire William Ahmanson,” and changed the company name to “American Information Systems,” which became “ES&S in 1997 after the acquisition of [BRC].” Bob’s brother “Todd is a vice president of ES&S.”]
Election Systems & Software (“ES&S”)
35. ES&S has been a heavy-hitter for many years. In 2010, Wired described ES&S as the “national’s largest voting-machine maker, with machines being used in 43 states. ES&S systems were ‘utilized in counting approximately 50 percent of the votes in the last four major US elections,’ according to the company’s website.” https://www.wired.com/2009/09/diebold-sells/
36. ES&S resulted from the 1997 merger of American Information Systems and Business Records Corporation (“BRC”).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Election_Systems_%26_Software#Electronic_Poll_Books_for_the_City_of_Chicago [“American Information Systems acquired the Election Services Division of Business Records Corporation and was reincorporated as Election Systems & Software, Inc. in December 1997. .. As a result of this merger, ES&S becamse the largest voting system vendor in the United States.”]
37. BRC was reportedly funded by former billionaire Nelson Bunker Hunt. http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/whose-water/whose-voting-machines
38. And the family of Howard Ahmanson played a “key role” in financing American Information Systems, ES&S’s predecessor, which acquired BRC.
http://www.omaha.com/columnists/kelly/kelly-this-omaha-company-shaped-how-america-counts-its-election/article_459030e0-b522-5a7b-b953-1e6c958e5439.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=email&utm_campaign=user-share [“In 1979 [Robert Urosevich] got an infusion of capital from a family friend with Omaha roots, California millionaire William Ahmanson. The company’s name was changed to American Information Systems.”]
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2005/12/nation-under-god/ … [“[T]wo heavy contributors to the Chalcedon Foundation-Reconstruction’s main think tank-are Howard Ahmanson and Nelson Bunker Hunt, both of whose families played key roles in financing electronic voting machine manufacturer Election Systems & Software.”]
39. Hunt and Ahmanson were early members of the Council for National Policy. http://www.seekgod.ca/cnp.ho.htm#nhunt [Nelson Bunker Hunt — “CNP vice president, 1982–1983; President Executive Committee 1983–1984; CNP Executive Committee 1988, member 1998”]
http://www.seekgod.ca/cnp.a.htm#ahmanson [Howard Ahmanson — CNP member 1984–85, 1988, 1996, 1998].
40. “The Council for National Policy (CNP) is an umbrella organization and networking group for social conservative activists in the United States. … Nation magazine has called it a secretive organization that ‘networks wealthy right-wing donors together with top conservative operatives to plan long-term movement strategy.’” http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/council-for-national-policy/
41. The CNP was founded in 1981 by “at least five fathers,” including “Christian activist Paul Weyrich,” billionaire Nelson Bunker Hunt, the Rev. Tim LaHaye (then head of the Moral Majority), “businessman and one-time murder suspect T. Cullen Davis,” and “wealthy John Bircher William Cies.” http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121170&page=1 …
42. Weyrich (now deceased) co-founded several other organizations as well, including:
- The Moral Majority (with the Reverend Jerry Falwell),
- The Heritage Foundation,
- The Free Congress Foundation, and
http://www.latimes.com/local/obituaries/la-me-weyrich19-2008dec19-story.html [Weyrich founded the Moral Majority, the Heritage Foundation, and the Free Congress Foundation]
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2016/05/17/council-national-policy-behind-curtain … [CNP founder Weyrich co-founded ALEC]
43. Here is a 1980 video of Paul Weyrich where he says “I don’t want everybody to vote.”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GBAsFwPglw
44. In recent years, the CNP has kept its member lists confidential. But the Southern Poverty Law Center obtained and published one from 2014. Here is a link to the directory. https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/cnp_redacted_final.pdf …
45. As shown in the 2014 directory, the CNP’s recent members include Kellyanne Conway, Steve Bannon, Richard DeVos, Jim DeMint, Ken Blackwell (member of Trump’s voter fraud commission), and Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association.
46. Pence recently confirmed that he too is in the CNP. https://medium.com/@archiestrauss/pence-constituents-never-forget-governor-a-continuing-compendium-a2d1cdc94d8b …
47. The New Yorker says the Mercers are also in the CNP.
The Reclusive Hedge-Fund Tycoon Behind the Trump Presidency
Last month, when President Donald Trump toured a Boeing aircraft plant in North Charleston, South Carolina, he saw a…
48. The CNP’s 2014 vision statement lays out its goal: “A united conservative movement to assure, by 2020, policy leadership and governance that restores religious and economic freedom, a strong national defense, and Judeo-Christian values under the Constitution.”
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2016/05/17/council-national-policy-behind-curtain … …The CNP’s goals for 2020 include.
49. CNP members Hunt & Ahmanson (who are now deceased) were also large contributors to the Chalcedon Foundation, Christian Reconstructionism’s main think tank. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2005/12/nation-under-god/ … …
50. Here is a link to a document apparently created by Gary North explaining what Christian Reconstructionism is and is not. https://www.garynorth.com/freebooks/docs/pdf/christian_reconstruction.pdf
51. ES&S also has close ties to former Senator Chuck Hagel (R).
52. In 1996, Hagel was chairman of ES&S. That year, Hagel stepped down from his position as chairman and launched his Nebraska Senate bid two weeks later.
How E-Voting Threatens Democracy
As the controversy around e-voting grew last year, parodies like this one began to emerge. This Hustler magazine spoof…
53. A pre-election poll called the race a “dead heat,” but Hagel won by 15 points https://harpers.org/archive/2012/11/how-to-rig-an-election/3/ …
54. Nebraska’s deputy secretary of state for elections, confirmed that ES&S machines counted 85 percent of the votes in Hagel’s race. (The remaining votes were counted by hand.)
55. With his 1996 Nebraska senate victory, Hagel became the state’s first Republican senator since 1972. (See above for source.)
56. As discovered by election integrity advocate Beverly Harris, although Hagel relinquished his chairmanship with the company, he maintained a substantial ownership interest in McCarthy Group, which owned 25% of ES&S. His treasurer also was chairman of McCarthy Group and sat on ES&S’s board of directors.
How E-Voting Threatens Democracy
As the controversy around e-voting grew last year, parodies like this one began to emerge. This Hustler magazine spoof…
57. In 2009, ES&S acquired Diebold/Premier, but the Department of Justice forced ES&S to sell because the combined company accounted for seventy percent of US voting equipment! Diebold/Premier was thus purportedly “dissolved” and its assets split between ES&S and Dominion Voting.
Justice Department Requires Key Divestiture in Election Systems & Software/Premier Election…
WASHINGTON — The Department of Justice announced today that it will require Election Systems & Software (ES&S) to…
58. After the DOJ forced ES&S to sell, Dominion bought not only Diebold/Premier, but also Sequoia.
Former Diebold e-voting unit settles Ohio lawsuit
Premier Election Solutions has agreed to pay $470,000 to 47 Ohio counties in order to settle a lawsuit filed two years…
60. As a result, Dominion and ES&S account for roughly 90% of U.S. voting equipment. http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7906
61. Fortune.com has described Dominion and ES&S as two “monster companies” that dominate the U.S. voting machine market. “But don’t try to estimate the size of the election market based on SEC filings: Dominion is privately held, & ES&S is fully owned by Omaha-based private equity group McCarthy Capital.” http://fortune.com/2014/11/04/who-profits-from-election-day/ …
62. As discussed in computerworld.com, “[E]lection system makers can operate in much the same manner as any vendor to build code; that includes using overseas developers.” Dominion, for example, “develops its systems in the U.S. and Canada but also has an office in Belgrade, Serbia,” and was recently advertising openings for four senior software developers in Belgrade.”
One election-system vendor uses developers in Serbia
Voting machines are privately manufactured and developed and, as with other many other IT systems, the code is…
63. Meanwhile, it has been reported that the Romney family has ties to voting machine vendor Hart InterCivic. https://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonykosner/2012/11/06/the-technological-foundations-of-todays-election-are-shaky-especially-in-ohio/#3581da5ff2d5
64. In addition, a company called EasyVote has installed some sort of voting software across 85 Georgia counties and 8 other states.
Client Focus: EasyVote Solutions Powers the Vote
EasyVote Solutions powers the vote with its SAAS voting software. Taylor English Duma client, EasyVote Solutions, is an…
65. I doubt anyone has vetted EasyVote to see what political donations, if any, its officers and directors have made or if the company employs anyone with a criminal record. Although not nearly on the level of a political donation or criminal background, the CTO did retweet the following post, which suggests a partisan bias:
More on Smartmatic
66. Since before the 2016 election, a rumor has circulated that George Soros owns voting machine company Smartmatic (the company that previously owned Sequoia and has ties to Chavez). This isn’t true.
Instead, according to Wikipedia, Smartmatic’s chairman (Malloch Brown) has “been closely associated” with Soros with whom he has worked “to fund humanitarian functions.” Malloch Brown also was named vice-chairman of two important Soros organizations and rented Soros’s apartment while working on United Nations assignments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Malloch_Brown,_Baron_Malloch-Brown#Association_with_George_Soros
67. The ongoing concern and confusion over the ownership and associations of Smartmatic and other voting machine companies brings me to my last point, which is this: The current absence of readily available public information about these vendors contributes to the toxic distrust between the parties. Voting machines are the electronic equivalent of counting paper ballots behind closed doors, and no one should have to trust their votes to companies that have not been thoroughly vetted with detailed reports publicly posted by state election officials.
68. It seems this will not happen without a law compelling our elected officials to conduct this basic due diligence. So let’s get a law. It’s time to shine a bright light on the companies that hold the keys to our democracy.