It’s not an assumption, it’s a series of calculations involving known physics.
David Piepgrass
1

Do you have a necessary and sufficient falsifiable hypothesis statement of AGW, or CAGW, that you can either state, or quote?

It seems you could get the same correlation between CO2 and temperature if in fact temperature drove CO2, rather than the other way around. Care to construct a falsifiable hypothesis that can exclude natural climate change?

Like what you read? Give Jere Krischel a round of applause.

From a quick cheer to a standing ovation, clap to show how much you enjoyed this story.