Jere Krischel
Jul 25, 2017 · 1 min read

When you’re able to present a necessary and sufficient falsifiable hypothesis statement of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming, I’d be happy to play the science game. To wit:

1) a list of observations, which if observed, mean a hypothesis is false;

2) a logical argument that the lack of those falsifications means that a hypothesis must be favored over all others (including the null).

Translation into plain english (inspired by Scott Adams):

1) tell me what would change your mind;

2) tell me why those if the things that would change your mind aren’t there, the only explanation left is AGW.

Until then, all of the mounds of “evidence” are just as applicable as the many mounds of evidence in support of astrology. Pseudo-science is recognized by lack of falsifiability, and if you can quote a necessary and sufficient falsifiable hypothesis statement, you’ll have fulfilled my falsification criteria :)

    Jere Krischel

    Written by

    Socially liberal, fiscally conservative, born again carnivore, musician, firearms instructor and skeptical civil rights activist.