I think comparing it with a terrorist with his finger on a detonator is a bit of a stretch to put it mildly.
I agree that the self defence argument is a valid one.
Svetlana Voreskova
31

Yeah, that comparison is only to establish that we already have legal, sanctioned, and regrettable killing. You and I may disagree on how to weigh the competing interests, but I think conceding that zygotes are human, and that sometimes, even though regrettable, homicide is the lesser of two evils, we open the door to more useful conversations:

  1. How do we reduce unwanted pregnancies?
  2. How do we support those people with unexpected pregnancies (without discouraging forming stable two-parent families)?
  3. What reasonable restrictions can we agree upon for abortion in general, while still protecting the rights of people to make the regrettable decision to terminate a pregnancy?

None of these conversations is black and white, and if we could move the debate onto those areas, we would be mostly working the problem behind the problem — how do you avoid having to decide between the lesser of two evils?

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.