Private Water Interests and the Public Good
In a world where our water delivery systems are aging and disintegrating, we must be adamant in our insistence that private business and corporate interests are paying for the resources they take for their own profit. As our infrastructure collapses, companies like Nestle capitalize on the crises caused by the types of failures we have seen in Flint. This is by NO means exclusive to Flint and similar disasters will likely continue emerge in many more municipalities in the near future. It simply makes no sense to allow such water extraction for “free” by Nestle, Coke and Pepsi, etc., while allowing the public distribution of water to become compromised.
“Water is of course the most important raw material we have today in the world. It’s a question of whether we should privatize the normal water supply for the population. And there are two different opinions on the matter. The one opinion which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOS, who bang on about declaring water a public right. That means that as a human being you should have a right to water. That’s an extreme solution (emphasis mine). And the other view says that water is a foodstuff like any other, and like any other foodstuff it should have a market value. Personally I believe it’s better to give a foodstuff a value, so that we’re all aware that is has its price…”
— Nestlé CEO Bilderberger Peter Brabeck
These corporations are essentially mining our water for virtually nothing, then bottling it and selling it back to us for anywhere from 1000–1900% markup. It is outrageous to think that not only is there no tax at the wellhead for such enterprises, but that they ultimately benefit when we do have municipal crises like we have in Flint. This is two-fold insofar as 1) bottled water becomes necessity for those afflicted by crises, and 2) the reputation and safety of tap water is further eroded and undermined. It is an unconscionable scenario we allow to happen. If we need funding for our water supply (and sewage) infrastructure, then make them pay a fair market value for the water they take and put it directly into funding improvements. This is our public resource! We have become so inured to the idea of a so-called “free-market”, that we are totally blind to how we are being scammed left and right. Why we continue to let multi-billion dollar, international corporate conglomerates get away with this is absolutely beyond me. We need to make them pay.
“Michigan, a water-rich state surrounded by four of the five Great Lakes, charges high-volume, self-supplied water bottlers like Nestle and Absopure only $200 per year in paperwork fees to operate. There’s no state tax, license fee or royalty associated with the company’s extraction of a precious natural resource.” (Why Nestle pays next to nothing for Michigan groundwater)
If you feel that Nestle should not be granted an increase, you have a brief time left to comment:
So, we are finally coming to the end of this long process… Why they were ever asking for public input is a god damn mystery!
“MDEQ says it cannot consider public support for or opposition to a permit when making a decision. The agency has received more than 50,000 comments on the proposed permit so far” (Michigan Radio).
We, as a state, need to be taxing these massive water withdrawals and putting the money DIRECTLY back into infrastructure spending for our municipal water systems and environmental protection for water supplies. We need to demand that our state legislature address this deplorable extraction of OUR resources for the profit of a multi-national conglomerate (any of them!). Why we let this continue is beyond me.
We have got to change this situation!
About 500 people showed up to a public hearing in Big Rapids hosted by Michigan's Department of Environmental Quality…michiganradio.org
MORE: Live coverage of public hearing BIG RAPIDS, MI - Residents who wish to stymie a bottled water giant's bid to…www.mlive.com
The number of plastic water bottles sold in the US grew from 4 billion in 1997 to an estimated 26 billion in 2005…www.container-recycling.org
Why is bottled water a concern? Here are just a few reasons... Making bottles to meet America's demand for bottled…www.banthebottle.net