There are some great points about privileged hipster activists in this that is completely derailed…
Leighanna Rose Walsh

You prove a few of the author’s major points here:

  1. You do not agree with free speech. The author does. There’s a real difference of opinion here.

2. The topic of your upcoming article is an interesting one — though one that is theory-centered (communism — but with speech) and probably lacks little actual applicability under scrutiny (underlining the author’s point).

3. “Ultimately the problem is that you’re raising against notions of privilege while displaying your own.”

-You are throwing “privilege” around as a slur (as did the author to be honest). This is an aspect of the culture the author criticizes.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.