Hi Kelly and Joe.
Diego Macías W.
31

These are excellent elaborations on the discussion, Diego! I am inclined to agree with you that the patterns of privatization at the center of capitalism — especially when combined with the observation that this is always a process of dispossession for others — is a key part of the way state-sanctioned corporatism plays out in the long run.

Where it gets interesting is in the applications of social democracy to measure public value in non-monetary terms. Capitalism is essentially about contractual arrangements of ownership between individuals (or corporations as “proxies” for people). These ownership frameworks include a set of “benefits” that the owner can exclude from non-owners. And these benefits have increasingly been self-oriented, materialistic, and essentially translatable into monetary terms.

So when we put a price tag on nature, we are transforming it into conceptual capital and making it a servant to the way of thinking that runs through the core of capitalist philosophy.

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.