Next is your characteristically feeble attempt to avoid a point of fact that I raised regarding the unique circumstances of the election. I cited the mail in balloting as one of those issues NOT BECAUSE MAIL IN BALLOTING IS USED AT ALL BUT BECAUSE OF UNPRECEDENTED EXTENT TO WHICH THAT METHOD WAS PROMOTED, IMPLEMENTED, COLLECTED, AND BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT LAWS WERE HASTILY CHANGED(ALMOST ALWAYS UNCONSTITUTIONALLY) IN SO MANY PRECINCTS. OH YEAH, AND THE FACT THAT MAIL IN BALLOTS WERE RECEIVED AND COUNTED FOR FOUR DAYS AFTER THE FUCKING ELECTION WAS OVER!!
But you didn't address any of that Carl. Instead you tried to pretend that I was simply talking about the concept of mail INS and then you proceeded to rebuttal the point that you invented, even accusing me of opposing military personal's ability to vote , in an egregious effort to sidestep the point of fact that I actually did raise.
Let me ask you Carl, how many times in your lifetime have ballots been accepted and counted for several days after the election?
THE ANSWER IS ZERO AND YOU KNOW IT.
Do not come back with Covid or to point out that ballots are always arrived after the election and counted for weeks before certifying the elections. You're an idiot and if I have to destroy your idiocy again by citing the differences I will not be nice about it.
You make the willfully ignorant claim that mail in voting is not inherently less secure and fraudulent and , again, you clearly think that nobody is aware of obvious reasons that mail INS are absolutely by nature less secure than voting polls let alone the fact that every election committee , board, or organization acknowledges this self evident truth and regards this as indisputable.
That's why you tried to pull a straw man argument.