Rick — you mock the MSM line when it makes one argument, but then quote the Mail Online (!) to support the opposite argument. And on the video you linked the guy states ‘This actually disproves global warming’ — a profoundly stupid statement that pretty well discredits everything else he says.
Otherwise you have your cherry-picked examples that all seem to be on one side of the argument. That is inherently not a balanced way to approach anything — especially an incredibly complex subject that is so obviously loaded up with BS and agendas on all fronts. Can I suggest this as maybe a more authentically skeptical stance: