How decentralized is Threads? Not at all for now.

Callmejojo
PERCS
Published in
3 min readJul 7, 2023
Threads: Challenging Twitter’s Dominance, but Falling Short on Decentralization

Meta’s announcement of Threads, a social media platform aiming to challenge Twitter’s dominance, brought with it the promise of decentralization. However, upon closer examination, it becomes evident that Threads currently lacks significant decentralization features. In this article, we will delve into the current state of Threads and discuss the limited progress it has made toward achieving decentralization in the social media space.

Understanding the Fediverse

To grasp the context of Threads’ decentralization, it’s crucial to understand the concept of the Fediverse. The Fediverse refers to a collection of interconnected social networking platforms that utilize open protocols like ActivityPub. This protocol enables users on different platforms to interact and share content seamlessly. It promotes a decentralized and federated social media ecosystem, where users have greater control over their data and can connect across various platforms.

Limited Decentralization Efforts

Contrary to initial expectations, Threads falls short in terms of embracing decentralization. Notably, the platform does not support the widely adopted ActivityPub protocol, which is essential for interoperability with other decentralized networks in the Fediverse. This absence prevents seamless interaction between Threads and existing platforms that adhere to decentralized principles, such as Mastodon and Pixelfed.

The Absence of ActivityPub

Adam Mosseri, the head of Threads at Meta, confirmed that the platform will not include ActivityPub support upon its launch. ActivityPub is a key component of decentralized social media as it enables users to connect and share content across different platforms within the Fediverse. Without this support, Threads remains isolated from the larger decentralized ecosystem, limiting users’ ability to interact and share content with those on other platforms.

Lack of Hosting Independence

Another important aspect of decentralization is the ability for users to host their own instances or servers. This feature grants users greater control over their data and enhances the overall decentralization of the platform. However, Threads does not currently offer this option, further highlighting its centralized nature. Users are reliant on Meta’s infrastructure, limiting their control over their data and online presence.

Challenges in Striking a Balance

While Threads’ lack of decentralization features is evident, it is important to acknowledge the challenges that arise when attempting to achieve a balance between decentralization and moderation. Ensuring user safety, combating abuse and misinformation, and maintaining a cohesive user experience are complex tasks that require careful consideration. Striking the right balance without compromising decentralization principles remains a significant challenge for Threads and other social media platforms.

Future Prospects

Though Threads currently lacks significant decentralization, it is possible that Meta will incorporate more decentralized features in the future. As the platform evolves, there may be opportunities for Meta to adopt protocols like ActivityPub, allowing Threads to integrate with the broader decentralized social media ecosystem. However, until such steps are taken, the decentralized nature of Threads remains limited.

Conclusion

Threads currently falls short of achieving decentralization, lacking ActivityPub support and hosting independence. These limitations hinder its connectivity with other decentralized platforms and impede user control over data. While there is potential for improvement in the future, Threads’ current state limits its ability to fully embrace decentralization in the social media landscape.

For those seeking a truly decentralized social media experience, platforms like Lenster, DSCVR, and Warpcast offer compelling alternatives to Threads. These platforms prioritize interoperability, user control, and distributed networking. While Threads currently falls short of achieving full decentralization, it is worth monitoring Meta’s next move.

We are present on Threads and crossing our first 100 followers, follow us there and we’ll be glad to connect with the builders! @getpercs

--

--

Callmejojo
PERCS
Editor for

Farcaster believer. Please note that none of the content here should be constituted as financial advice.