hypothetically : Dave the artist
reporter : your new sculpture in central park, its quite provocative dont you think?
Dave : provocative, huh yea i guess you could say that.
reporter : what would you say the piece is saying?
Dave : its about the declaration that art made in the moment has legitimacy over art that's taken time to make, that by doing so your art become a product. as apposed to a calamity of emotion and imagination.
reporter : why make a piece that says that? why pick that subject?
Dave : because i felt i could express that concept in this way, effectively.
reporter : you really think that's true?
Dave : no, that's what the piece is about. the piece is an expression of that statement.
reporter : but its your statement, your art?
Dave : right, I made it.
reporter : so then if you dont believe the concept, why make a statement about it, in such a supportive way?
Dave : its not meant to be supportive, its an expression of that concept. its abstract in that way i suppose.
reporter : well if the art is not meant to be effective in being supportive of your concept then why make the piece at all?
Dave : because, its a concept to get that idea across.
reporter : so its a methodic piece. pointing out methodically, time intensive produced art is not as legitimate as art that is casted in the moment. but is meant to do so ineffectively?
Dave : yes
reporter : …….do you think people well understand it?