This is insane and beneath your intelligence.
surya yalamanchili

This is a fascinating topic and a great question to attack at some point in the future: What effect, if any, does a president have on employment and the stock market?

I assume by your use of the word “insane” (twice), and the implication my point is stupid, you believe a president has little impact on employment and the market?

I recently asked financial columnist Jonathan Clements a variation of this question. Here’s the exchange …

Me: Was the Obama recovery reversion to the mean? And does that mean the ‘Trump Bump’ is his doing?
Clements: W/o 2009 stimulus, the market recovery would likely have been more muted. W/o chance of lower corporate taxes, perhaps a smaller Trump Bump.

So both Obama and Trump get credit in his view. I agree with that.

My current view is based on this quote from Peter Mallouk, founder of wealth-management firm Creative Planning:

“Stock prices are always a reflection of anticipated future earnings.”

This implies something that we both know is true. The market reflects corporate and investor confidence in the future, and I think it’s insane to deny President Trump has had an impact on that. Beneath your intelligence, really. :-)

Seriously, though … if Trump is not responsible for the rising stock market, who is?

One clap, two clap, three clap, forty?

By clapping more or less, you can signal to us which stories really stand out.