Some of the BLM proposals are abstract and general, but do qualify as solutions. The embedded Facebook page states that BLM “marched and protested to highlight the urgent need to transform policing in America, to call for justice, transparency and accountability…”

The lack of specifics should easily be understood to be due to the wide variety of issues in various parts of the country that justice faces. Law enforcement agencies are local rather than national and every jurisdiction will be different in issues, degrees of severity of injustice, and potential specific solutions for their specific problems.

A general solution that I’ve seen in many BLM discussions online is the need for retraining police officers in how to deal with people of color, how to deal with the presence of firearms, and how to deal with transparency in policing. There’s also a condemnation of the grand jury system that allows biased prosecutors who work with local police to bring a weak case before a grand jury in order to prevent an officer from facing charges for potential wrongdoing, even despite damning video footage being available.

If you only look at one website and pretend it represents the movement entirely rather than the thousands of discussions BLM members and supporters are carrying on in varying mediums of communication, it’s understandable that you might not find the proposed solutions you’re looking for.