SOCIAL RHETORIC

Nowadays… There’s a social trend rooted in the principles set forth by our civil rights, which enhance people’ social right to voice their personal opinions whether the person is an intellectual or simply a common person. This social reflex can be relevant to any giving social situation, which can provoke many people’s emotional reactions…

Harry Dreyfuss’ view about people reaction to his dad interest in attending a political rally. The action itself… Does not constitutionalize neither a legal, moral nor a political conflicting issue; thereby, social rhetoric either positive or negative as long as someone social action does not rise neither a cultural nor legal civil conflict… All social rhetoric fall within the framework of freedom of speech!

…So, where’s the root cause of Harry Dreyfuss’ problem? Perhaps, H. Dreyfuss’ inherent psychological needs dwell within its need to draw some public attention to himself… Why? Because… There some people, who would not mind getting some social recognition… Is that a cultural or civil problem? You tell me at… <cocoqui@outlook. com>

� ��