I understand that. Is the supposition that Clinton would have stopped AGW? AGW is serious if true, and should not be relegated to being used as a tool to castigate Trump. It is too likely to become lost in all of the other anti-Trump rhetoric. The world needs to respond to AGW especially China…. what good does it do to stop our coal industry, and then buy Chinese products because they are cheaper than others, all while they add to green house gasses?